Eset Nod32

B

Big Steel

Any anti-virus program will catch a couple of things that another will
miss. None of them is perfect, and what they will catch varies from
day to day as they are updated on different schedules.

So undoubtedly Microsoft Security Essentials caught things that NOD32
missed, but on those days, NOD32 would also have caught things that
Microsoft Security Essentials would have missed.

But both of these are very good.
I will not be using NOD32 anymore after the license expires.
 
Y

yester64

Why do you dismiss MSE so easily? Is it because it is a MS product, or
is it because it is free? You would do well to have another close look
at MSE and compare its performance with the 'names' e.g. NOD32,
Kaspersky etc... I dumped Kaspersky after 6 years' devotion for MSE.
Nah, its not like that.
I read about MSE and it does fine. Others have more features or update
quicker. I am refering to an article in the c't recently. But in this
article the eset version was not ready for a test.
Right now i have MSE running. Haven't checked the report in the
program. Is there a report? Need to check that.

So how good is it really? Because i have no clue really, but i figure
its better than nacked.
 
Y

yester64

Although I used to use and recommend Zone Alarm because of its outward
protection, I've more recently become convinced that outward
protection is an illusion. Once one of the nasties gets into your
computer, it can essentially do whatever it wants, including
circumventing the firewall. So the extra protection provided by a
firewall that monitors outbound traffic is more apparent than real.
I think the host file mentioned some posts earlier is a good
protection regarding outbound traffic since it blocks certain ip's.
Made sense to me. On Windows i have no clue about the firewall, but i
read in several magazines that the windows firewall is good enough.
 
K

Ken Blake

I will not be using NOD32 anymore after the license expires.

That's fine. I don't want to try to talk you into it. And if you are
using Microsoft Security Essentials, you're using a very good
anti-virus.
 
O

occam

Nah, its not like that.
I read about MSE and it does fine. Others have more features or update
quicker. I am refering to an article in the c't recently. But in this
article the eset version was not ready for a test.
Right now i have MSE running. Haven't checked the report in the
program. Is there a report? Need to check that.

So how good is it really? Because i have no clue really, but i figure
its better than nacked.
Here is a good place to start your search:

http://av-comparatives.org/
 
J

John Morrison

That's a good idea but I'm too forgetful for that approach. I'm
currently running Win XP Pro SP3 and plan around the end of the year to
build some new boxes running Win 7 Pro. Do you have a suggestion for an
anti-virus that WILL allow scheduling that breaks suspend. I really
don't want to run around the house playing with computers just before
bedtime.
I run two computers and switch off at bedtime, I also don't fancy
playing with computers just before bedtime.

In the morning I get out of bed and while still dressed in my jarmies I
fire up both computers and update SUPERAntiSpyware, Spybot, Malwarebyte
& SpywareBlaster and check for updates and update as necessary. I start
ESET scanning and also running the above mentioned programs.

I set Eudora checking for email and then go for a SS&S, I don't shave
because I have a full beard so one S shouldn't have appeared.
 
M

Muad'Dib

Just curious, what Linux distro do you use?
Sorry for the long delay, I am a very busy person so don't get on here
as much as I used to, but with winter just around the corner that may
change. Right now I am still using Ubuntu on this machine and the one
before it and before that, have Ubuntu Ultimate on a net-book which I
like. I have Mint installed in Virtual Box on this machine as I have
clients who like it so I use it to be familiar with were things are etc
and can boot it quickly to run through step-by-step instructions with a
client on the phone. I also run XP Pro in Virtual Box on here for when I
need to do a quick Windows something or another like work related stuff.
I dual boot Windows 7 and Ubuntu on this machine. I also have just a
Linux test virtual machine for checking out various Distros via
downloaded live CD images. I know you have been partial to Mint lately,
and while I do like it and have installed it on client's computers,
their choice as I always give options including Windows, I still am
partial to Ubuntu.

Cheers
 
M

Muad'Dib

Even the latest one that forces you to use Unity and Gnome3?
Actually, I haven't taken time to even check out anything past 10.04LTS
really. I did boot one of the later releases in the virtual machine but
only briefly, and since then I just haven't had time. I'll have to take
a closer look to see what you are talking about. Hmmm, I have a little
time today.. I'll get back to you, but I have to download the latest
first. ;)

Cheers
 
M

Muad'Dib

Actually, I haven't taken time to even check out anything past 10.04LTS
really. I did boot one of the later releases in the virtual machine but
only briefly, and since then I just haven't had time. I'll have to take
a closer look to see what you are talking about. Hmmm, I have a little
time today.. I'll get back to you, but I have to download the latest
first. ;)

Cheers
Alrighty then, I see what you are talking about. I thought maybe they
would have a desktop interface choice at login, but nope. I see it being
newbie friendly, but it's not for me. Guess I'll be checking out some
other Distros to see what I'll be changing to. I'll play with Mint some
more, and also see if they have a later version to tinker with.

Thanks for the heads-up

Cheers
 
M

Muad'Dib

It seems they are getting tablet orientated. I have no use for tablets.
Yes, that is exactly where I see them going, and moving towards the
cloud bit. I have no need for a tablet, as when I am away from my
computer I find/get what I want on my Droid phone which is mostly just
weather, football scores/stats and things of that nature. Tablets are ok
for those who like them, I find them cumbersome for things, well, like
this where a real keyboard and large screen is just plain easier. So let
them make yet another division for that sort of thing, but leave regular
Ubuntu as a normal desktop OS.

Winders 8 is completely tablet orientated. I hadn't really taken a
look at it until today. It looks just fine for anything touch screen,
but why would I want it on a regular desktop? I don't.

Cheers
 
B

Big Steel

Yes, that is exactly where I see them going, and moving towards the
cloud bit. I have no need for a tablet, as when I am away from my
computer I find/get what I want on my Droid phone which is mostly just
weather, football scores/stats and things of that nature. Tablets are ok
for those who like them, I find them cumbersome for things, well, like
this where a real keyboard and large screen is just plain easier. So let
them make yet another division for that sort of thing, but leave regular
Ubuntu as a normal desktop OS.

Winders 8 is completely tablet orientated. I hadn't really taken a look
at it until today. It looks just fine for anything touch screen, but why
would I want it on a regular desktop? I don't.
You are not correct about an all tablet anything.

<http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-20100365-75/windows-8-to-offer-both-metro-and-desktop-interface/>

<copied>

With touch-screen capabilities and an overall theme borrowed from
Windows Phone 7, the Metro UI has been designed with smartphones and
tablets in mind but can run on traditional computers as well.

However, for people who want better control over their PCs, Microsoft
will also offer the more traditional desktop interface as an
alternative. By default, Metro will actually hide and not even load the
Windows desktop. But people who prefer the more familiar environment can
easily flip a switch to display the desktop, which Sinofsky referred to
as "just another app" in Windows 8.

<end>
 
M

Muad'Dib

Like Ubuntu' last version where you could choose between Unity and
Gnome, Windows 8 lets you choose between classic desktop or Metro.
Ubuntu stopped giving you a choice with the latest version. Who knows if
Windows 9 will continue to copy Ubuntu.
Ah ok, I just haven't had time to fully research either newer systems.
That should change soon with winter on its way. I think the Ubuntu team
needs to rethink, and allow a choice at boot. If one can choose a
regular desktop for the new Windows, then good deal, glad to hear it.

Cheers
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top