Confused about todays updates

[BillW50]

In

You are all-seeing eye of God. You obviously know it - all you have to
do is wait for the rest of us to worship you.

Nope, simply put, knowledge and wisdom always leads to the same
conclusion.

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." ~
Albert Einstein

"The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be common in religion and
politics, but it is not the path to knowledge; it has no place in the
endeavor of science." -- Carl Sagan

"He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the
spinal cord would suffice." -- Albert Einstein

 

[BillW50]

In

This is true, and usually why I bail........

....thanks for the tip.

From what I seen from you Dan, you make claims about others of things
they never said. And when you are caught doing it, you then start
slandering and calling people names that isn't true.

 

[DanS]

In


From what I seen from you Dan, you make claims about others
of things they never said. And when you are caught doing
it, you then start slandering and calling people names that
isn't true.

"From what I seen from you" ?..."...names that isn't true".

And you claim to be intelligent.

Things they never said........oh...you mean like where I
balked at your "evidence" about how bad XP SP3 on HP PCs and
it's all MSs fault, yet the evidence said exactly the opposite
at the end, that it was HPs fault......

.....and then later on you claim I "tooth and nail defended
SP3?"

I'd say that's a claim I never said.

.....oh wait...that was *you* that did that.

I guess it's my imagination that I've seen at least 4 or 5
others here will low opinions of you, in this thread alone.

(Pred.)

 

[BillW50]

"From what I seen from you" ?..."...names that isn't true".

And you claim to be intelligent.

I see, that was a different DanS who said things like: "lying scumbag"
and "friggin retard", isn't that so Dan?

Things they never said........oh...you mean like where I
balked at your "evidence" about how bad XP SP3 on HP PCs and
it's all MSs fault, yet the evidence said exactly the opposite
at the end, that it was HPs fault......

Really? Then how do you explain Symantec says: "Blame XP SP3 problems on
Microsoft" then? And how do you explain that later builds of SP3 were
fixed by Microsoft? But you always throw out all evidence that disagrees
with your beliefs, isn't that so Dan?

....and then later on you claim I "tooth and nail defended
SP3?"

I'd say that's a claim I never said.

Sure you do. You said SP3 problems isn't Microsoft's fault. Even many
others said it was Microsoft's fault. And the final nail in the coffin
was when Microsoft fixed it. And I asked you many times now, which you
refuse to answer, why would Microsoft fix a Service Pack if there was
nothing wrong with it in the first place Dan?

....oh wait...that was *you* that did that.

Hardly, I don't ignore the evidence like you do. And when you do, it is
nothing short of cognitive dissonance.

I guess it's my imagination that I've seen at least 4 or 5
others here will low opinions of you, in this thread alone.

(Pred.)

That is ok, as long as you refuse to do your homework, you will always
feel that way. No news there.

Should you find yourself the victim of other people's bitterness,
ignorance, smallness or insecurities; remember, things could be worse.
You could be them!!! -- Anonymous

 

[DanS]

I see, that was a different DanS who said things like:
"lying scumbag" and "friggin retard", isn't that so Dan?

Nope. I stand by those words. Others here concur.

Really? Then how do you explain Symantec says: "Blame XP
SP3 problems on Microsoft" then? And how do you explain
that later builds of SP3 were fixed by Microsoft?
But you
always throw out all evidence that disagrees with your
beliefs, isn't that so Dan?


Sure you do. You said SP3 problems isn't Microsoft's fault.

No, you stupid, retarded, a**hole.....(words that I will
continue to stand by).

I said that the proof you cited, *when you posted it* as to
why MS is always at fault, said exactly the opposite of what
you claimed.

That's all. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

[BillW50]

Nope. I stand by those words. Others here concur.



No, you stupid, retarded, a**hole.....(words that I will
continue to stand by).

I said that the proof you cited, *when you posted it* as to
why MS is always at fault, said exactly the opposite of what
you claimed.

That's all. Nothing more, nothing less.

Still won't comment when Symantec says it *is* Microsoft's fault, will
you? And if you looked up the link and read the article. They say people
who says it isn't Microsoft's fault are wrong. As they proved it was
Microsoft's fault and of course, Microsoft had no comment. Which is just
like you Dan, as you have no comment either except it isn't Microsoft's
fault even when there *is* proof that it was! And even Microsoft proved
it was their fault when they fixed it. You keep ignoring any evidence
that goes against your beliefs. So how long are you going to be in denial?

 

[Nil]

Nope, simply put, knowledge and wisdom always leads to the same
conclusion.

So does cherry-picking what fits your preconception from the available
evidence, ignoring what doesn't fit, and twisting the rest until you
think it fits. Add a few dashes of paranoia, self-aggrandization, and
martyr complex and you have... you.

That's what I've been seeing.

 

[BillW50]

In

So does cherry-picking what fits your preconception from the available
evidence, ignoring what doesn't fit, and twisting the rest until you
think it fits. Add a few dashes of paranoia, self-aggrandization, and
martyr complex and you have... you.

That's what I've been seeing.

I haven't seen it, but if you have... let's see the evidence? If you are
right, I'll totally agree with you. And if you can't show anything, we
then know what you are all about won't we?

 

[Char Jackson]

In

I haven't seen it, but if you have... let's see the evidence? If you are
right, I'll totally agree with you. And if you can't show anything, we
then know what you are all about won't we?

You don't read your own posts?

(I thought that was what CTRL-H was all about.)

 

[BillW50]

In

You don't read your own posts?

(I thought that was what CTRL-H was all about.)

Yes I do actually. I don't see it. And if you do, well show me. Remember
I think more like Spock than most people. If you try illogic, I am not
buying.

 

[Nil]

I haven't seen it, but if you have... let's see the evidence? If
you are right, I'll totally agree with you. And if you can't show
anything, we then know what you are all about won't we?

I'm not going to get sucked into your game.

All the "evidence", examples of each behavior, is earlier in this
thread.

 

[BillW50]

In

I'm not going to get sucked into your game.

All the "evidence", examples of each behavior, is earlier in this
thread.

I ask for evidence and you refuse. HOW IN THE WORLD DO YOU THINK I AM
GOING TO BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU SAY WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE? Only a fool
would be that dumb.

The only thing I can think of was that some were blaming HP from the get
go (speaking about XP SP3 problems). This is indeed true, some were. But
after more did investigations it turned out to be Microsoft's fault and
I can't find anybody blaming HP after this was found out. And Microsoft
fixed it. This is the only thing I can think that you are talking about.
Otherwise I don't have a clue.

 

[Char Jackson]

In
Yes I do actually. I don't see it. And if you do, well show me.

If you're aware of your posts and you don't see the behaviors
described by Nil, then no amount of 'showing you' is going to help.
Denial is a very powerful force and is not easily overcome.

Remember I think more like Spock than most people.

We didn't have to go far to find an example, did we?

 

[Char Jackson]

Otherwise I don't have a clue.

Now we're getting somewhere.

It's a small step, but a very important step.

 

[BillW50]

In

If you're aware of your posts and you don't see the behaviors
described by Nil, then no amount of 'showing you' is going to help.
Denial is a very powerful force and is not easily overcome.


We didn't have to go far to find an example, did we?

In

Now we're getting somewhere.

It's a small step, but a very important step.

You too just don't get it! I too can make false claims about others all
day. But I am better than that and I will not play that game. And I have
repeatedly asked anything that I was ever wrong, just show me. Yet
repeatedly you people refuse. What is it just laziness or what? Or are
you afraid it will just expose you for what you really are?

 

[Char Jackson]

You too just don't get it! I too can make false claims about others all
day. But I am better than that and I will not play that game. And I have
repeatedly asked anything that I was ever wrong, just show me. Yet
repeatedly you people refuse. What is it just laziness or what? Or are
you afraid it will just expose you for what you really are?

If you're aware of your posts and you don't see the behaviors
described by Nil, then no amount of 'showing you' is going to help.
Denial is a very powerful force and is not easily overcome.

 

[BillW50]

In

If you're aware of your posts and you don't see the behaviors
described by Nil, then no amount of 'showing you' is going to help.
Denial is a very powerful force and is not easily overcome.

Are you aware you talk a lot, but show nothing? I believe in evidence.
No evidence, no belief. It is just that simple. Keep talking without
evidence and I don't believe a thing you say. Provide evidence and now
we are talking.

 

[Char Jackson]

In

Are you aware you talk a lot, but show nothing? I believe in evidence.
No evidence, no belief. It is just that simple. Keep talking without
evidence and I don't believe a thing you say. Provide evidence and now
we are talking.

Do you read your own posts? The evidence is there for anyone to see,
even you.