choro wrote:
That's overdoing it a bit, isn't it? Why don't you have one on the
ceiling so you can watch porno while lying down? ;-)
But, in your case, that would block the mirror you have on the ceiling.
(yuck yuck yuck)
The problem with getting ever bigger monitors so you can show multiple
but separate [virtual] desktops within them is that you putting all your
eggs in one basket. If the monitor fails, you lose ALL your desktop.
If you have multiple monitors, you can still see the other desktops when
one of them fails. Having multiple monitors is like having multiple
hard disks in a RAID-3/5 config so you have immediate hardware recovery
instead of being completely down awaiting hardware replacement. For
those that can afford it (yes, I realize that might not include you and
it doesn't include me), hardware redundancy is important to them and
they can pay for it.
If I had the space (or could make room) and if I had the money, yeah,
I'd get another monitor so I could code and compile in one monitor while
browsing or checking results in a different monitor - and I'd still
probably make use of multiple virtual desktops within one monitor to
separate different tasks. However, virtual desktops within one monitor
become a pain after more than a few of them hence why folks like to use
multiple monitors along with the added feature of concurrent viewing
instead of having to switch between desktops.
Besides, based on your logic of getting ever larger monitors, the
"lizard" eye coordination you mention will still be present in one huge
monitor.