C
Chuck
Thanks. I'll check it out.
C
Citronella®
Paul.Paul said:
You have been around long enough to know the issue is
not just going to dissolve on your say so, Paul.
Yes, you *would* like the subthread to die, but this time it
is just not going to happen.
This is Usenet, not your M
rg bLog.Both these articles require addressing, you cannot exist
(easily) on Win* forums with these things as ghosts.
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
You say you are not Paul Derbyshire, the evidence says
you are, quite so.
I am only too happy to discuss the topic with you over
email, and go away satisfied. Continue as you are and
we have "bullterrier and bone" situation. Understood?
Let's see what a weekend to think about it does for
you, yes?
ciao
G
gufus
A
A Banned Of Heroes
Indeed; you have been misidentified. After doing some research, I'm satisfied
that you're not a 'Seamus sock.'
For example, your namesake used the IP address 74.104.131.76 (or the hostmask
AFPKqyVc0++aHDvqGtFSpQ.user.aioe.org) for all his posts between 22:47 GMT on
November 24, until 20:18:30 GMT on April 30, 2007. The hostmasks in your posts
are different. Your churlish namesake keeps begging for 'proof' of who he is
and evidence of his sock usage, so he has no grounds for complaint when that
evidence is found and posted.
It appears to me that your namesake wants to create confusion and get somebody
else blamed for his foolishness. For example, a poster known as 'Rhino' was
frogged by your namesake. They were both users of aioe, both in the same time
zone, and both posted to rec.arts.tv and one of the comp.lang.* groups, and your
namesake used the similarities to create confusion.
It's a duplicated radius and load sharing arrangement. There's a Bell
discussion paper about this arrangement if you're interested.
The reverse DNS for your namesake often resolves to a Sympatico DSL
connection in Pembroke. The IP addresses used by your namesake and
you are very different. During the time he lived in Ottawa, he didn't
know how to change his IP, and the ones you and he used on the same
dates are different.
So either you aren't him, or you've pulled off concealing this sock for
over 10 years without a single slip. I don't believe he could do it.
He resets his modem to change his IP address now. When he was caught
doing it, he tried to claim that Windows updates on his box were responsible
for four simultaneous changes of IP addresses and hostmasks of his socks.
The fool even tried to claim that logging out of one of his multiple
Google Groups accounts would change his IP address. With that level of
stupid, it's small wonder he keeps getting caught, over and over again.
You both use the same free news servers, you are - or were - both located
in Ontario, you both have an interest in computers, and sometimes you've
posted to the same groups. Your namesake enjoys the confusion this creates,
and uses it as 'proof' of how he 'doesn't run socks' - although the proof he
did in this group are shown in the two MIDs in my sig.
Changing to a fee for service NSP is easier, cheaper, and better for you.Maybe I should change my name ?
You'll get a better Usenet service with long article retention. Paying a
handful of dollars per month for reliable Usenet is beyond the means of
the kook, and you'd never be mistaken for him again.
I've never been to Pembroke either, and I've only used one nym in this group.
Can you think of a time when Goober Gropes has not sucked? ;-)
http://groups.google.ca/groups/[email protected]
There; you've been posting under the same alias since 2002, at least.
--
"Sweetness Seal Of Approval" #4 BWMDW, Trainer - December 2012
Hammer of Thor - December 2012 BWMDW, Co-Trainer- August 2012
Sock washing, pressing and tumble-drying for the public benefit
<[email protected]> hostmatch <[email protected]>
C
Citronella®
Satisfaction way too quickly grasped I fear.A Banned Of Heroes said:
You overlooked "Rhino" was consistent for months of any year in a PGD
profile, only in recent times introducing change which a group could live
with?
As with the whole of your post - "crickets" to that offer.
Hannibal Lectar had a smile as did Dr. Jekyll during questioning.
Being, it appears there is a deliberate separtation beginning around 2002
designed to thwart (partially) forensic links. The behavorial sciencve
however fits perfectly.
ahhh... the selfdenial contained within scales of magnitude we ourselves
could not imagine. Could I remind you "we" are not mentally focused on
achieving such a track record?
errr... shades of the successfull Troll?
Yet history shows the announcement of the snare is largely ignored by
the audience until the instances multiply.
- see my preceding statement.
.... and has been put to "Paul <[email protected]>" on a number of
occassions, along with offers to "sort it in email".
As with any response to your post - "crickets" to that offer.
/rolls eyes
Forgive me for being fresh out of Top Scout badges/wards I left
my bag at the chapel :->
Paul is lying, and no doubt for good cause - in his judgment.
Currently, outside of Abasani... there is no "free server" that perfoms
consistently as well as E-S.org. Paul has spent many many hours
ingrartiating himself to both Ray and the E-S.org support groups,
to the point of 24/7 monitoring of posts.
On the other side of that same coin there exists ample evidence of
PGD monitoring of posts in his 'play' groups regardless of any
actual physicial location. As is known the pool shrinks every other
month for Paul's "free" Usenet access, take E-S.org out of the equation
and Paul's obession with FIGJAM posts has no legs.
Capiche?
Where did "Paul <[email protected]>" come from?
There is the question that lays begging for an answer.
C
Citronella®
I "Citronella¨" wrote on 3rd May 2013;
... and so we return to the bone, Paul.Paul.
You have been around long enough to know the issue is
not just going to dissolve on your say so, Paul.
Yes, you *would* like the subthread to die, but this time it
is just not going to happen.
This is Usenet, not your M
Both these articles require addressing, you cannot exist
(easily) on Win* forums with these things as ghosts.
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
You say you are not Paul Derbyshire, the evidence says
you are, quite so.
I am only too happy to discuss the topic with you over
email, and go away satisfied. Continue as you are and
we have "bullterrier and bone" situation. Understood?
Let's see what a weekend to think about it does for
you, yes?
ciao
A
A Banned Of Heroes
Not too quicky. If you have evidence he's Dweeby, please show it to me.
Nope. And I'm not expecting any. Well, not from the aw7g denizens.
The Rhino spogeries I found were very subtle changes in the posting address.
Rhino's address, <[email protected]> was sporged as
As expected.
The behavior fits, but the ability to maintain his cover doesn't; my sig is
partial evidence of that. Recall also how he tried to cover up his forgery
of Bob Larter in 2009. And, note his use of the sockpuppet "Slartibartfast"
<[email protected]> in AUK using a proxy.
Message-ID: <de79b767-aa26-45a9-a842-1833c1a1b43d@j18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
The same sock was later used in ratv and also in a non-Usenet group, 'enclojure',
and establishes one link for the kook's move from Ottawa to Pembroke.
X-IP: 74.14.132.73 (Ottawa at the time of post)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-IP: 76.64.153.70 (Ottawa at the time of post)
Message-ID: <1bc94105-9e97-466c-87e3-97eec537ea05@n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.65.38.176 (Pembroke)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
The 'enclojure' group also has other socks of the kook operating in it.
Perhaps not, however the k00k has two mistaken and unshakable belief that
are both fallacies - firstly, that he'll never get caught; secondly, that
his lies and bluster will cover up his mistakes forever.
Anyboby in that audience with 1/4 of a clue would vivisect him.
The Nadless sock has already been in aw7g for a while.
See mine. ;-)
If you have any evidence this guy is the k00k, please post it.
Ray knows who Dweeby is, yes?
And Ray, by examining his logs, can also determine the IP addresses used by
Sure. But you haven't shown enough evidence about <[email protected]>
to convince me he's the kook. I've pursued my own research, completely
independently or you or anybody else, and I have arrived at most of the
same results. You know why; the numbers don't lie.
Once you allow yourself to be guided by anything other than the numbers,
you risk your credibility and allow the kook the opening he desperately
needs to raise doubts about all the correct information you have presented.
It's known how the kook lies; he even lied about me losing my Altopia account,
for one example. See my headers? But you need more than coincidence.
I don't agree; <[email protected]> should not have to prove his innocence.
It is you who must prove his guilt - with a common hostmask or IP address.
--
"Sweetness Seal Of Approval" #4 BWMDW, Trainer - December 2012
Hammer of Thor - December 2012 BWMDW, Co-Trainer- August 2012
Sock washing, pressing and tumble-drying for the public benefit
<[email protected]> hostmatch <[email protected]>
C
Citronella®
As with the whole of your post?A Banned Of Heroes said:
This may be the same thread/vote Derbyshire ran socks in against
Bob, all the while twisting the stats on his own nomination... I would have
to check this out, whatever... your link is not evidence of an inability to
maintain cover, it *is* evidence of Derbyshire playing in grounds he
had not ventured into before, just as was his dally with a/f/n earlier.
Point being, in familiar 'territory' Derbyshire is well able to maintain
separation of identities.
Given that he has been "caught" (eventually) by several people over a
number of years I would offer he continues with impunity that very
projection you note.
You can be sure more than one has (now) searched the links provided.
I merely assumed so, the precedent being set in the older - now abandoned -
There is exactly the why of where we kookologist(s) are where
we are today in respect of Paul Derbyshire. Paul slakes the proof
with his own version of spin and posts boringly repetitive links back to
his posts. BE sure the very first page Paul read on k00kology was:
(http://fnvw.databasix.com/faq.html)
If you want "black n white" proof you are not going to find it, well... in
27,000 (plus) posts ..?.. with three times that number
again, as socks...?.. you will be a long time looking.
I recall reading a post claiming he had made 400 posts in a
window of 24.hours, more than once in a month.
Are you really convinced his use of "Twisted" as a net.nym is a
coincidence?
So I read... yes.
That too is a reasonable assumption.
In fact it is at server level Derbyshire is most vulnerable.. somehow he
has it in his head administrators care what he posts where, so he hides...
even from them.
.... and are contrived, of that I am sure.
Paul knows numbers, is in fact at savant level in his manipulation of same.
The alignment of the numbers is there for the looking, what is missing is
those looking. IF... if that work had begun back when "alien/anon"
first teamed with Derbyshire in a/u/k I am sure what links existed would
have been unearthed. Now it is - and will be - a hard slog IF anyone at all
i s interested in looking.
Paul projects, that is well known. Having lost so much in the way of access
himself it is a partner to his owned fear that he wishes the same on
others. I am sure his candle has burnt low (often) writing complaints.
ahhhh.. the ye olde "habeas corpus" challenge?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/habeas_corpus
More than enough of those writs, my friend, have been overturned
in history in using overwhelming circumstantial evidence to return
the applicant to the cells. Whilst I myself would not favor such a
direction in taking "Paul <[email protected]>" toy's away I
cannot agree to the lack of linkage by numbers _today_ to be sufficient
'evidence' to absolve "Paul <[email protected]>" of his part in destroying
a number of newsgroups.
I have only just returned to my desk following a lengthy (enjoyable)
absence in RL.
"Paul <[email protected]>" can indicate he
is willing to provide what should be so easy for him to do, if innocent, I
am not accepting the withdrawal of his puppetry from groups as a 'victolly'
for Usenet. Derbyshire has pulled socks before today only to insidiously
rerun his game at a time that suits him, usually long after pursuit has
waned.
/hangs out sign
~~~~~~~~MEN AT WORK~~~~~~~~