- Joined
- Feb 12, 2010
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 1
I personally think that Microsoft has gone overboard with all the security, it is becoming more apparent that this might be the downfall of Windows 7 (Another Windows ME).
It is all good and very fast, better than Vista OS, but why all the security, do we as the users really need it, all it is doing is frustrating the hell out of me.
I develop systems for clients and have not really got the time to play around trying to figure out what to set and not to set to get my programs running, thus me and all my clients still run XP Pro or 2000 Pro.
They should of had an option to Install with a the !"£$% Security, or just plain like windows 2000, or XP without the security.
If you look at all the postings on Windows 7, it all has to do with the !"£$% Security.
So who thinks Microsoft should give us a version without all the unnecessary security?
PS. Maybe we could start a petition requesting them to give us a version that is actually user friendly (That will be a first for them
)
It is all good and very fast, better than Vista OS, but why all the security, do we as the users really need it, all it is doing is frustrating the hell out of me.
I develop systems for clients and have not really got the time to play around trying to figure out what to set and not to set to get my programs running, thus me and all my clients still run XP Pro or 2000 Pro.
They should of had an option to Install with a the !"£$% Security, or just plain like windows 2000, or XP without the security.
If you look at all the postings on Windows 7, it all has to do with the !"£$% Security.
So who thinks Microsoft should give us a version without all the unnecessary security?
PS. Maybe we could start a petition requesting them to give us a version that is actually user friendly (That will be a first for them