S
Stan Brown
By the way, changing "a few words in one of the posts so that the
message were not identical" is still multi-posting.
+1
By the way, changing "a few words in one of the posts so that the
message were not identical" is still multi-posting.
You could argue that it belongs here more than there because the program
is more likely to be used by Windows 7 users who, like me, cannot abide
Windows 8.
I'm not so sure. But I guess that most of "us here" have never posted
anything, so it's impossible to know their nationality.
Expecting all posters to know what English words Americans don't
understand, and to avoid using them, is asking a bit much I'd say.
No, it's what you get for being knowingly inconsiderate. I'm with
Zaphod on this one.
By your own admission, you knew multiposting was wrong, but you chose
to do it anyway.
But wait, there's more.
The article was about Windows 8 and irrelevant to Windows 7. You
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8, so there was no need to post your
article to a Windows 7 newsgroup by any method.
I just downloaded 3.6.7 from there. The link was accurate.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/classicshell/files/?source=navbar
It didn't have bad effects - it was missing one of the most
important good effects (from the Windows 7 user point of view).
There is no contradiction though - many Windows 7 users are
forced to use Windows 8 and dislike it, whereas a few Windows 8
users might like Windows 8 (shudder) as it is and without
ClassicShell. The program is therefore more likely to be of use
to a regular Windows 7 user than a regular Windows 8 user.
I was just trying to be helpful - which, as I have said elsewhere, I
will not do again.
Expecting all posters to know what English words Americans don't
understand, and to avoid using them, is asking a bit much I'd say. Apart
from anything else, it's boring. Deffo.
Of course it does. I'm sure that anyone running Windows 7 is interested
in what is happening with Windows 8.
The only sensible way?
I strongly disagree. Classic Shell is a good choice; I also like it.
But Start8 (at the very low price of $4.99 US) is even better.
Since you strongly disagree, you surely must have one or more substantial
reasons. Have you shared them with the group? I've seen your claim that
Start8 is better at least a dozen times in the past few months, but I don't
remember seeing the reason(s) why you feel that way. Perhaps it's only
better for you?
+1
And in the reverse direction too, of course.
Try it and see for yourself. It has a free trial period.
Sure, it's OT, but your explanation is exactly how I understand the
word. So, correctly used about Classic Shell.
I don't think anyone has provided any evidence of pressure from MS or
elsewhere, so it might be premature to say "correctly used".
Those of you using Classic Shell as the only sensible way to use Windows
8 on a desktop will be sad to know that it has been nobbled. The latest
version (3.6.8) has no facility for bypassing Metro - which was one of
the main reasons for using it. It would appear the author has been
nobbled, one way or another, by Microsoft.
So, don't update, and hang onto your versions 3.6.7 - it still runs on
8.1 so all is well.
Well, the release notes for 3.6.8 say...
-Modified the Classic Shell logo and removed the Metro button by request
from Microsoft
What the "Metro Button" is, er, was, I don't know. I don't have Win8.
Ken, Char asked why *you* think it's better. Using it for the trial
period can't answer that question.
Char Jackson said:I had to look up 'deffo'. That's how out of touch I am.![]()
Cool, thanks, Dan. I can see how some would interpret that as
'pressure'.