Uhh the celeron is liek the AMD 3 core, some thing didnt make the bench test so they relabled it and markeded it cheeper then standard
Plus celeron is the crapest proc I have ever used in my life. I belive the celeron has a level of cache that didnt make the cut and is disabled now reason for slow speeds. one cant compare any celeron to a AMD, AMD will otu bench mark the celeron any time of day.
I have the Pentium D 830, which I have seen at 3.2Ghz otu work some of thier core 2 duo of today, ( LGA 775)
But it also depends on the other system too. only way you can compare benchmarks is if the systems are = set up form hardware to software and configured exzactly the same. if not its liek comparing two of the same muscle cars but one has a tricked out engine. just nto fair to do
Rember background services, registry pullution, software installed. are all factors in performance and can make or break a bench test. thats why I laugh at the AMD/Intel benchtests. enless you are using straight procs non of th3 AMD Intel software you will see different resualts. If i rember correctly AMD has OC software, Intel doesnt. so the software stabilizes the proc where intel has nothing to stablize it
IDK im jsut rambling on it have fun
P.S. what is a good bench testing software (free)