Does Microsoft still do outlook express for windows 7.........?

[Gene E. Bloch]

alt.windows7.general:

Yeah, but my point was that Thunderbird knows how to properly include
pictures with email messages. If the recipient has trouble with them,
it's their problem, not Thunderbird's, contrary to the claims of our
troll-of-the-moment.

That is exactly what I was trying to point out.

 

[KCB]

Well, I tried it, sending test messages with Thunderbird, doing both
and an in-line picture and an attached picture. Both messages were
viewable with the pictures intact in Gmail and Comcast web mail, and
with Thunderbird and Pegasus mail after POPping them down to my
computer.

It's a moot point, anyway, because "D. Arlington"/"Valorie" is clearly
a lying troll in the first place.

I'm thinking more toward ineptitude than insincerity, but you may be right.

 

[BillW50]

In

Yes, chalk it up to experience

I am far more efficient using OE6 with QuoteFix than using Thunderbird,
Forte Agent, XNews, Dialog, Gravity, etc. As the others don't have all
of the important features one needs to be efficient.

 

[Gene E. Bloch]

In

I am far more efficient using OE6 with QuoteFix than using Thunderbird, Forte
Agent, XNews, Dialog, Gravity, etc. As the others don't have all of the
important features one needs to be efficient.

Perhaps you failed to notice the pun...

 

[BillW50]

In

Perhaps you failed to notice the pun...

Oh that was a pun? Sorry I missed that. But seriously all of those other
non-Microsoft readers really missed the boat. And I heard a few years
ago from one guy who said that he and others pushed Microsoft to add
this very basic stuff like show only replies to your posts. And
Microsoft finally did. It wasn't even Microsoft's idea. Too bad that
same group didn't go after other readers as they all missed the boat on
all of this stuff. I can't believe they all could miss something so
simple and basic. Yet they did. :-(

 

[Stan Brown]

And I heard a few years
ago from one guy who said that he and others pushed Microsoft to add
this very basic stuff like show only replies to your posts. And
Microsoft finally did. It wasn't even Microsoft's idea. Too bad that
same group didn't go after other readers as they all missed the boat on
all of this stuff.

Valorie, we've already corrected your false statements about missing
features in other newsreaders, yet here you go again. Gravity, for
instance, lets you filter to show only replies to your articles, and
I'm sure it's not the only one.

Of course, I don't know why you'd want that feature, since you don't
actually seem to read the replies.

 

[BillW50]

In

Valorie, we've already corrected your false statements about missing
features in other newsreaders, yet here you go again. Gravity, for
instance, lets you filter to show only replies to your articles, and
I'm sure it's not the only one.

Of course, I don't know why you'd want that feature, since you don't
actually seem to read the replies.

Valorie? I have been posting *only* under BillW50 since '94. And before
that under WilliamW23 since '86. So what kind of bull are you trying to
pull? Seriously? I really hate it when people falsely accuse somebody of
something. I personally think you people should be thrown in jail. As I
could falsely accuse people too, but that would be so wrong. So what is
wrong with you?

I have Graviity installed right now and it does the same? Really? This I
love to see this.

 

[Stan Brown]

So what kind of bull are you trying to
pull? Seriously? I really hate it when people falsely accuse somebody of
something. I personally think you people should be thrown in jail.

Thrown in jail? Really?

I guess that means you think you should be thrown in jail, since you
post false information about newsreaders even after you've been
corrected.

I have Graviity installed right now and it does the same? Really? This I
love to see this.

It's easy -- set up a filter, for instance. But we've been through
this before, and there's obviously no point in my continuing.

 

[BillW50]

In

Thrown in jail? Really?

Yes really! How would you like it if I drag your decades of reputation
through the mud? That just isn't right and I am all for bring back being
tarred and feathered. As it would be too kind for the likes of you.

I guess that means you think you should be thrown in jail, since you
post false information about newsreaders even after you've been
corrected.

Really? I have been complaining about this for years and nobody has
shown me being wrong yet. And you are going to do it? Okay let's see
what you got!

It's easy -- set up a filter, for instance. But we've been through
this before, and there's obviously no point in my continuing.

Oh, you are chickening out? No we haven't been through this before. And
I would *love* to be personally proved wrong! As I am personally tired
of complaining about this for years and I wish somebody besides
Microsoft of coming up with a solution. But all I end up with is just
broken promises. :-(

 

[BillW50]

In

You need to start using Claws-Mail that is distributed under GPL
license with lots of plugins, Add-Ons and Themes.

<http://www.claws-mail.org/>

Try this link for Windows systems:

<http://www.claws-mail.org/win32/index.php>

Microsoft has all but given up on Email technology and very soon start
marketing Microsoft brands of genetically produced oranges, bananas,
and other vegetables and fruits to stop pirates from distributing its
software without paying!.

Need to? Nobody needs to do anything for one. And secondly, Claws bites
(to be of poor quality, displeasing). They even claim this on their
website. It doesn't even support news! And like most GPL software, it
looks like an old Windows 3 application. The reason why GPL software is
free, is because nobody in their right mind would pay for such software
that is of such poor quality (aka bites).

http://onlineslangdictionary.com/definition+of/bite