card

G

gufus

Hello, All!

Can someone suggest a good PCI video card for win7.

--
-gufus
Thou Shalt NOT excessively annoy others or
allow Thyself to become excessively annoyed

Message-ID: Sent at 13:55
 
P

Paul

gufus said:
Hello, All!

Can someone suggest a good PCI video card for win7.
Newegg lists maybe fifty entries for PCI video cards.

The thing is, there are lots of older technology cards, things like
FX5200. The problem with those, is whether Aero would work. You'd
want a DX9 card minimum, with 128MB RAM, and it has to have a (WDDM ???)
driver to be fully functional in Windows 7. I'm sure you can use a
lesser card, and fewer of the visual features of Windows 7 would work.
In such a case, you could use something like an ancient 7000 card,
which would barely function as a frame buffer. And if it didn't have
a driver, you'd be in pretty bad shape. Maybe the Windows 7 install
wouldn't finish. Perhaps a 6200 would be a good compromise between
cost and features (i.e. it might make most things work in Windows 7).

What I find though, looking at the products, is anything with
a newer GPU, costs too much. Now, this is a reasonably recent
GPU, but they want $83 for it. And the thing is, this would not
be a strong gaming card. I'd really expect to pay $50 for this,
not $83. So these are overpriced. And I can see even more expensive
ones than that, which have a wimpy GPU and PCI interface. Perhaps
the cost is caused by needing a bridge chip on the video card,
to convert from PCI to PCI Express on the GPU ? That really shouldn't
add that much to the product cost.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814131325

(The square thing at the bottom of this picture, is the bridge chip.
I think I see "PEX" printed on it, a plxtech.com product.)

http://images17.newegg.com/is/image/newegg/14-131-325-Z04?$S640W$

Some of the older cards are "native" PCI, and don't use a bridge.
Or they have some way of wiring the card, that it doesn't need an
expensive solution to make the bus connection.

One thing you should know about cards like that, is sometimes the
driver disables certain features, based on knowledge of the interface
type. For example, that video card has video playback acceleration,
and can almost completely decode certain movie formats on its own.
But if the driver detects the card is in a PCI slot, it might
disable "3:2 pulldown" or other kinds of features. The driver
disables such features, on the assumption it is better to disable
them, than to allow the user to experiment with the feature and see
for themselves, that it doesn't work well. Any feature which uses
a lot of bus bandwidth, would be a candidate for being disabled at
the driver level. So if you compare a 4350 PCI Express x16 card to
a 4350 PCI card, you'd find some features disabled on the PCI card,
due to bandwidth issues.

In terms of basic screen usage, a lot of frame buffer operations
will be smooth, because once a window is loaded, you can move the
window around on the screen without repainting it (compositing done
at the GPU level, stored in the 512MB video card local store).
So the PCI slot bandwidth doesn't become a big problem then. But
I have noticed, if you're using things like QuickTime Player, if
you drag the playback window around, it repaints the rectangle,
and that is slow and choppy. I discovered that while testing my
FX5200 PCI. Not all video operations are cleverly done.

So by that definition, there *is* no good PCI graphics card, because
of the bandwidth restrictions of the slot you're using. PCI is
133MB/sec best case. PCI Express x16 is 4000MB/sec. AGP 8x is 2133MB/sec.
You can see from those numbers, there is a big ratio in favor of the
other slot types. As long as the card makes good usage of memory
chips on the video card (local memory), you can move windows around
the screen and the result won't be choppy. But any graphics operation
which pumps a lot of data through the PCI slot, is going to stutter or
be sluggish, and there is no way to fix that. You could try all 50
different graphics cards for sale, and see the same problem with all
of them, and it will be because of the PCI slot.

PCI slots come in several different types, but the most common (95+
percent of the time), is the 133MB/sec variety. They come in faster
flavors, but desktop computers don't normally have the faster ones.
For example, you can have a 64 bit slot, running at 66MHz, giving
533MB/sec peak transfer rate, which would be every bit as good as
an AGP slot, but only server/workstation motherboards have a slot
like that. Desktop computers virtually always have the 32 bit
33MHz crappy type (133MB/sec, maybe 110-120MB/sec practical speed).

So, go ahead, buy a card, but don't expect miracles. You won't be
playing Crysis at 30 frames per second with it.

http://image.jeuxvideo.com/images/pc/c/r/crysis-2-pc-1300965014-121.jpg

*******

Here is another card with a modern GPU. The first review comments
are interesting.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161353

"Cons: Terrible performance, even with the latest drivers from HIS.

100% gpu load when simply dragging a window around on-screen with
Win7 Aero enabled. Or resizing the window.

Disabling Aero made it even slower/laggier."

And further down...

"Other Thoughts: I bought this as a second card to power a second monitor
to get better performance in Photoshop. The screen connected to this
card was horrendously slow. I switched out of Windows 7 Aero theme and
performance improved ever so slightly. It was a painful chore to even
play freecell on that screen."

It really shouldn't be that bad, and perhaps a 6200 would work better
(due to features being unavailable).

Hmmm. Same kind of comment on this (older) 6200.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130477

"Pros: Works with Windows 7 64-bit!

Cons: Significant system lag if using Windows Aero themes

Other Thoughts: I purchased a total of 3 of these cards - one for a
friends computer and two for my own, both Windows 7 64-bit systems.
I'm now running 6 displays (infrastructure admin) without any issues,
although I did have to drop Windows Aero theme (still using Vista/Win7
basic theme). Some programs (MS Outlook is one) would cause my CPU usage
to skyrocket even if I wasn't doing anything within the program or had
the program displayed on a monitor connected to one of these video cards
due to using the Aero themes. Once Aero themes were disabled, I'm a
happy camper! The only PCI videocard I've found that works with
Windows 7 64-bit."

HTH,
Paul
 
G

gufus

Hello, Paul!

an AGP slot, but only server/workstation motherboards have a slot
like that. Desktop computers virtually always have the 32 bit
33MHz crappy type (133MB/sec, maybe 110-120MB/sec practical speed).
Scrap the PCI, my MB has 1 AGP slot :)

I have a Intel Desktop Board D865GBF

QUOTE:

Expansion Capabilities
Six (Desktop Board D865GBF) or three (Desktop Board
D865GLC) PCI bus add-in card connectors
One universal 1.5V AGP 3.0 connector supporting up to
AGP 8X

AGP 8X/4X graphics interface: Flexibility to
upgrade via a high-end AGP graphics card.

NOTE

Desktop Board D865GBF/D865GLC is only compatible with 0.8 V and 1.5 V AGP
cards.

The AGP connector is keyed for 0.8 V and 1.5 V AGP cards only; the connector
is not mechanically compatible with legacy 3.3 V AGP cards. Do not attempt
to install a legacy
3.3 V AGP card.

AGP is a high-performance interface for graphics-intensive applications,
such as 3D graphics.

AGP is independent of the PCI bus and is intended for exclusive use with
graphical display devices.

The AGP 3.0 connector supports 8x, 4x, and 1x AGP cards.



What would you suggest? The OS is Win7 32bit.


--
-gufus
Thou Shalt NOT excessively annoy others or
allow Thyself to become excessively annoyed

Message-ID: [email protected] Sent at 13:49
 
G

gufus

Hello, Paul!

gufus wrote:
Newegg lists maybe fifty entries for PCI video cards.
BTY

The monitor is a NEC LCD194WXM

Kevin


--
-gufus
Thou Shalt NOT excessively annoy others or
allow Thyself to become excessively annoyed

Message-ID: [email protected] Sent at 14:52
 
P

Paul

gufus said:
Hello, Paul!



Scrap the PCI, my MB has 1 AGP slot :)

I have a Intel Desktop Board D865GBF

QUOTE:

Expansion Capabilities
Six (Desktop Board D865GBF) or three (Desktop Board
D865GLC) PCI bus add-in card connectors
One universal 1.5V AGP 3.0 connector supporting up to
AGP 8X

AGP 8X/4X graphics interface: Flexibility to
upgrade via a high-end AGP graphics card.

NOTE

Desktop Board D865GBF/D865GLC is only compatible with 0.8 V and 1.5 V AGP
cards.

The AGP connector is keyed for 0.8 V and 1.5 V AGP cards only; the connector
is not mechanically compatible with legacy 3.3 V AGP cards. Do not attempt
to install a legacy
3.3 V AGP card.

AGP is a high-performance interface for graphics-intensive applications,
such as 3D graphics.

AGP is independent of the PCI bus and is intended for exclusive use with
graphical display devices.

The AGP 3.0 connector supports 8x, 4x, and 1x AGP cards.

What would you suggest? The OS is Win7 32bit.
Yes, the brown slot here is AGP.

http://www.ixbt.com/mainboard/images/i865pe-g-p/d865gbf-board.jpg

You could use the AGP version of the 6200.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...eactivatedMark=False&Order=RATING&PageSize=20

(Note - any of the 6200 cards would be a candidate. This is the
first one, where a customer review mentioned Windows 7.)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130452

"2/11/2011 1:21:19 PM

P4 Asus Mobo, DDR PC3200, rebuilt to run on Windows 7 32bit,
and worked flawlessly!"

Now, a card like that, would be lacking "buzzword compliance", in
that it might not provide hardware acceleration for video or for
flash or the like. More modern cards also have features like
GPGPU/OpenCL/CUDA computing. The problem with some of the cards,
is finding a driver to use. The delivered driver that comes in
the box with the card is a dud, and then you have to check the
customer reviews, to discover where the proper driver is available.
Sometimes, that driver is called "hotfix", because they fix the
driver that came in the box just the one time, and never offer
any newer drivers after that. So the level of software support
is pure crap.

So, for example, you could get a 4650 AGP, which would have a
slightly more modern feature set. It's $80 or twice the price
of something like a 6200. What's interesting, is some customers
seem to go through "driver hell" (never get the card to work
right), while others reply "no problem here", as if they just
install off the CD and away it goes. Really weird.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125281

But that 4650 is typical of what is left for AGP. Nvidia
no longer makes HSI bridge chips, so the odds are poor of
finding an NVidia bridged AGP new at retail. Whereas, ATI
is still doing cards with Rialto bridge chip.

I looked at the comments for a 4670 card, and that card
seems to be even worse for drivers. So it's very much a
matter of locating working drivers first, before considering
spending one thin dime.

So you can try the NVidia 6200, and maybe get bare Windows 7
functionality, or adventure with a more modern ATI card, and
"play the driver game". For things like Adobe Flash or
playback of movie content, your processor needs all the
help it can get, and a more modern video card (with
things like scaling by the GPU) can help lower the
amount of CPU needed to play movies.

Paul
 
P

Paul

gufus said:
If you were running Win98SE, Win2K, or WinXP, then
I'd be fine with the choice of MX4000. Perhaps it
wouldn't allow Adobe Flash to be hardware accelerated,
it wouldn't have a dedicated movie decoder in hardware,
and the version of DirectX in hardware wouldn't suit
modern games, but it would still work as a frame buffer.

But you're planning on running Windows 7. Your P4 processor
needs all the help it can get. When playing movies, if will
help if the video card can decode the movie instead of the
CPU. And Adobe Flash and Silverlight, have options to use
a more modern GPU as well.

If it was me, I'd aim a little higher than the MX4000 for
your Windows 7 machine. For performance reasons, you might
still end up turning off Aero, but at least you'll have
a choice and be able to do the test with and without it.

An HD4350, 4650, or 5450, have some of those more modern
features. They're more expensive, but may make your machine
work slightly better in certain situations.

Paul
 
G

gufus

Hello, Paul!

If you were running Win98SE, Win2K, or WinXP, then
Yep.. but I *may* upgrade to Win7 one day, and I'd get the better card :]
But you're planning on running Windows 7. Your P4 processor
Ah.. slow-slow pee4. You bet , the CPU need's all. the help it can get. I'm
just looking around, all my box's run XP. I may stick with that OS until
2014. (works good) IMHO


Thanks for all the help. Now If I want to give more money to M$. ?

Kevin

--
-gufus
Thou Shalt NOT excessively annoy others or
allow Thyself to become excessively annoyed

Message-ID: [email protected] Sent at 15:32
 
P

Paul

gufus said:
Hello, Paul!

If you were running Win98SE, Win2K, or WinXP, then
Yep.. but I *may* upgrade to Win7 one day, and I'd get the better card :]
But you're planning on running Windows 7. Your P4 processor
Ah.. slow-slow pee4. You bet , the CPU need's all. the help it can get. I'm
just looking around, all my box's run XP. I may stick with that OS until
2014. (works good) IMHO


Thanks for all the help. Now If I want to give more money to M$. ?

Kevin
I'm basing my experience on a Windows 7 laptop I was given, which
from a benchmark perspective is the same as a P4 at 3GHz. It is
fine and responsive, when loaded with just the factory software.
But as soon as I install a webcam software package, it starts to
slow down. And that tells me, that Windows 7 is just too bloated
for that weak a processor. I'd upgrade the laptop to a dual core
(as there is a socket compatible upgrade with the same TDP), but
it doesn't appear that they sell those processors at retail. You
can get them on Ebay, but have no way of knowing what condition
they're in.

The P4 I've got, is plenty fast with WinXP and Win2K, and is my
backup computer (used for the occasional benchmark and testing).
But I would never consider running Windows 7 on it, because
the video cards I've got, most of them aren't Aero ready.

The laptop has the equivalent of one of the video cards I was
mentioning. A weak HD 4000 kind of series, with not a lot of
gaming horsepower. But if I load some software that needs a
video decoder, that GPU has a decoder built into it. About
70% of the video cards I own, are similar to the MX4000, and
about all they've got, is a frame buffer. Yes, you can 3D game
with them, as they're DX8 or DX9 in hardware, but they're pretty
weak. They play Quake or Doom pretty good. But Crysis would be
a slide show, if it would load at all.

My current computer has enough horsepower to run Windows 7,
but I have no incentive to do that. This machine runs WinXP,
and occasionally, a Linux LiveCD.

Paul
 
G

gufus

Hello, Paul!

But as soon as I install a webcam software package, it starts to
slow down. And that tells me, that Windows 7 is just too bloated
for that weak a processor. I'd upgrade the laptop to a dual core
So, in your opinion a pee4 *isn't* a strong enough CPU for Windows 7?

--
-gufus
Thou Shalt NOT excessively annoy others or
allow Thyself to become excessively annoyed

Message-ID: [email protected] Sent at 13:02
 
P

Paul

gufus said:
Hello, Paul!



So, in your opinion a pee4 *isn't* a strong enough CPU for Windows 7?
I'd recommend something with a dual core, based on how my laptop works.
I feel if I had double the horsepower, it would be OK.

It would also help, to make the Windows 7 boot drive an SSD. You
can do that for around $100 now. My laptop uses a 40GB partition,
and there is probably 10GB free. I could move that partition,
over to one of these. The advantage of things like this, is a
much lower seek time. No head movement, like on a regular disk.
You'd use a regular hard drive for "data", and this thing just
holds your "boot". If you own one of these, do regular backups,
because these devices can still fail completely without warning.
They have firmware and their own internal processor, and can
go nuts depending on the "bug of the week".

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226168

The interface on that is SATA, which may be an issue with much
older PCs. My P4 machine has two SATA I ports, and I could plug
that $100 drive into one of those ports.

The Windows 7 installer CD, contains the necessary logic to deal with
proper alignment of the installation onto an SSD. It helps, if the
offset of the partition, is a power_of_two number of sectors, rather
than being the multiple_of_63 sectors used on older operating systems.
If you buy a Windows 7 DVD, and the SSD at the same time, and do the
installation, it's all taken care of for you.

Paul
 
C

Char Jackson

It would also help, to make the Windows 7 boot drive an SSD. You
can do that for around $100 now. My laptop uses a 40GB partition,
and there is probably 10GB free. I could move that partition,
over to one of these. The advantage of things like this, is a
much lower seek time. No head movement, like on a regular disk.
You'd use a regular hard drive for "data", and this thing just
holds your "boot". If you own one of these, do regular backups,
because these devices can still fail completely without warning.
They have firmware and their own internal processor, and can
go nuts depending on the "bug of the week".
I've been seeing 60GB SSD's on sale for $60, so the prices are
apparently coming down. This 60GB SSD, for example, is only $49.99
after rebate.
<http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227738>

As for failure modes, from what I've been reading they usually fail
slowly, although as you say, they can also fail quickly, just like a
regular (spinning) hard drive.
 
G

gufus

Hello, Paul!

If you buy a Windows 7 DVD, and the SSD at the same time, and do the
installation, it's all taken care of for you.
Nice Drive, well if anything *if* I upgrade this box, all It would get is a
viedocard and a new OS, Win7. It will work, not the fastest, but it works.
BTW, is AGP is better than PCI ?

Kevin

--
-gufus
Thou Shalt NOT excessively annoy others or
allow Thyself to become excessively annoyed

Message-ID: [email protected] Sent at 16:59
 
P

Paul

gufus said:
Hello, Paul!



Nice Drive, well if anything *if* I upgrade this box, all It would get is a
viedocard and a new OS, Win7. It will work, not the fastest, but it works.
BTW, is AGP is better than PCI ?

Kevin
Yes, AGP is better than PCI.

I really pity people who have PCI only motherboards - they can ask
for the "best video card for PCI", but no matter what they buy,
they're not going to be happy. It's the 133MB/sec thing that spoils it.

With AGP, you can be happy.

*******

I can't afford an SSD right now either, so it's no big deal.
I only allow myself the "luxury" of new hard drives, when the
old ones wear out. Then I pop for whatever $50 will buy.

Paul
 
P

Paul

gufus said:
Hello, Drew!

Never mind missed a post...Duh !
:]
http://www.gpureview.com/GeForce-6200-AGP-card-192.html

It's DX9 in hardware. (The predecessor FX5200 was also DX9 in
hardware, but was "missing" a couple features to be completely DX9.
I think the 6200 fixed that.)

The Pixel Shader PS/VS Version is 3.0/3.0 . I think
Windows 7 Aero needs a minimum of 2.0. So it meets that need.

Your selected card seems to have 512MB of memory on it. Sometimes
you have to be careful of "Turbocache" cards, where some memory
is resident and the rest is stolen from system memory. I gather
your selection has 512MB of local memory. I used this archived
link, since EVGA likes to mess around with their web site structure.

http://web.archive.org/web/20100314...a.com/products/moreinfo.asp?pn=512-A8-N403-LR

That video card would be in my "acceptable" category. If you want to
run Windows 7 on it, check that there is a driver. Otherwise,
I think it meets the requirements (128MB minimum memory for
compositing, PS/VS 2.0, WDDM driver).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Aero

"a DirectX 9 compatible graphics processor with a
Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) driver, Pixel shader 2.0
in hardware, and a minimum of 128 MB of Video RAM"

Your card also likely has a wide range of drivers, probably from
Win98SE up to Windows 7. Something you can't say for very many cards.
If Nvidia needs to drop support for a card, when it comes to drivers,
the 6200 is the very next card to be dropped. It's at the bottom
of the list. (The FX5200 was already dropped, and I own three of
those.)

HTH,
Paul
 
G

gufus

Hello, Paul!

That video card would be in my "acceptable" category. If you want to
Okay, I'm going to get the 6200 AGP for my pee4. (good enough hu)

Thanks for all the help eh. :)
--
-gufus
Thou Shalt NOT excessively annoy others or
allow Thyself to become excessively annoyed

Message-ID: [email protected] Sent at 14:08
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top