X
XS11E
Then why are you replying to a Linux troll?
C
chrisv
No they haven't.Quantum said:advocates have been saying this is the Year of Desktop Linux,
B
bd
They better hurry up.bd stated in post [email protected] on 10/25/10
10:05 AM:
Not sure the Democrats have figured out they have a majority.
A
AZ Nomad
bd stated in post [email protected] on 10/25/10 10:05
AM:
Pretty sure they don't think with a single mind.Not sure the Democrats have figured out they have a majority.
C
chrisv
Actually, this thread was started by a Wintroll pretending to be aXS11E said:Then why are you replying to a Linux troll?
Linux booster.
C
chrisv
Wrong.bd said:Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.
Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?
R
RonB
Isn't it amazing how, when you ask these WinTrolls what exactly WindowsThat's true of a lot of people actually.Your needs must be very rudimentary.Linux just does everything I need[...]
Although what's still unaddressed is just what am I supposed to be
missing exactly? I've got copies of Windows 7 and Snow Leopard and no
interest in running either one of them. Linux simply does not look bad
next to them (despite all the lies to the contrary).
does that Linux doesn't, they only come up with snide nothing? Just
Microsoft FUD, they don't even know why they are parroting it anymore.
R
RonB
Yeah, you're really "stable" there, "Frank."You and your butt-buddy lying linturd FUD spreading assholes are the
real sterling examples of TROLLS!
And, BTW, adios.
R
RonB
What users have been saying this? The imaginary ones in your head?I agree Linux is growing in the backroom but not on the desktop,
advocates have been saying this is the Year of Desktop Linux,
S
Snit
AZ Nomad stated in post
(e-mail address removed) on 10/25/10 11:01
AM:
(e-mail address removed) on 10/25/10 11:01
AM:
No, they do not... nor do they work together well.Pretty sure they don't think with a single mind.
R
RonB
Sure the Republicans are playing politics, and so is Obama and theHe probably can't given the mess he inherited and the republicans desire
to see the country collapse rather than work with a democrat.
Democrats. And that's what it always comes down to. But in the end, the
big corporations get what they want, no matter who is in power. Take
Health "Reform" (please take it). I was in favor of health reform, not a
program forcing Americans to buy health insurance that did nothing to
lower costs. And since health "reform" was Obama's main "accomplishment"
he and the Democrats deserve to stand or fall on it, especially the way
the shoved it through as "reconciliation"
R
RonB
Only if they rig the voting machines.Prediction: the Dems will win big in November and hold both houses.
R
RonB
Which is why I wrote "becoming" inconsequential. You'll have to admitRonB pulled this Usenet face plant:
As much as Microsoft bugs me, they are far from inconsequential, even
ignoring Windows (and MS Office and the "apps" that can be written with
it).
their "big events" are not nearly as big as they used to be.
R
RonB
I understood that -- just making my point that it doesn't matter who isThat was sarcasm.
there. Both Republicans and Democrats are crooked sell-outs.
V
Valorie *~
The dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?chrisv said:Wrong.
Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?
B
bugbuster
They only had 60 votes for a short time. And the Republicans usedThe dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?
blocks and secret blocks to bring the Senate to a halt. The crazy
Senate rules allow a single senator to block a vote (even a vote for
cloture) without having to identify himself.
Bug
V
Valorie *~
A year and a half is a short time? They could have passed anything theybugbuster said:They only had 60 votes for a short time. And the Republicans used
blocks and secret blocks to bring the Senate to a halt. The crazy
Senate rules allow a single senator to block a vote (even a vote for
cloture) without having to identify himself.
wanted. Their legislation was blocked or delayed by fellow democrats!
The kings of filibuster were the democrats during 6 of the Bush years.
B
bd
If that is the case, why didn't they filibuster the health care debacle?Wrong.
Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?
B
bd
Unfortunately, that is true. I'm just hoping we get some true statesmenI understood that -- just making my point that it doesn't matter who is
there. Both Republicans and Democrats are crooked sell-outs.
(women) in the ranks sometime soon.
C
Chris Ahlstrom
RonB pulled this Usenet face plant:
The bizznizzmen don't care about those ;->Which is why I wrote "becoming" inconsequential. You'll have to admit
their "big events" are not nearly as big as they used to be.
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.