X
XS11E
Then why are you replying to a Linux troll?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Then why are you replying to a Linux troll?
C
chrisv
Quantum said:advocates have been saying this is the Year of Desktop Linux,
No they haven't.
B
bd
bd stated in post [email protected] on 10/25/10
10:05 AM:
Not sure the Democrats have figured out they have a majority.
They better hurry up.
A
AZ Nomad
bd stated in post [email protected] on 10/25/10 10:05
AM:
Not sure the Democrats have figured out they have a majority.
Pretty sure they don't think with a single mind.
C
chrisv
XS11E said:Then why are you replying to a Linux troll?
Actually, this thread was started by a Wintroll pretending to be a
Linux booster.
C
chrisv
bd said:Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.
Wrong.
Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?
R
RonB
Linux just does everything I need[...]
Your needs must be very rudimentary.
That's true of a lot of people actually.
Although what's still unaddressed is just what am I supposed to be
missing exactly? I've got copies of Windows 7 and Snow Leopard and no
interest in running either one of them. Linux simply does not look bad
next to them (despite all the lies to the contrary).
Isn't it amazing how, when you ask these WinTrolls what exactly Windows
does that Linux doesn't, they only come up with snide nothing? Just
Microsoft FUD, they don't even know why they are parroting it anymore.
R
RonB
You and your butt-buddy lying linturd FUD spreading assholes are the
real sterling examples of TROLLS!
Yeah, you're really "stable" there, "Frank."
And, BTW, adios.
R
RonB
I agree Linux is growing in the backroom but not on the desktop,
advocates have been saying this is the Year of Desktop Linux,
What users have been saying this? The imaginary ones in your head?
S
Snit
AZ Nomad stated in post
[email protected] on 10/25/10 11:01
AM:
No, they do not... nor do they work together well.
[email protected] on 10/25/10 11:01
AM:
Pretty sure they don't think with a single mind.
No, they do not... nor do they work together well.
R
RonB
He probably can't given the mess he inherited and the republicans desire
to see the country collapse rather than work with a democrat.
Sure the Republicans are playing politics, and so is Obama and the
Democrats. And that's what it always comes down to. But in the end, the
big corporations get what they want, no matter who is in power. Take
Health "Reform" (please take it). I was in favor of health reform, not a
program forcing Americans to buy health insurance that did nothing to
lower costs. And since health "reform" was Obama's main "accomplishment"
he and the Democrats deserve to stand or fall on it, especially the way
the shoved it through as "reconciliation"
R
RonB
Prediction: the Dems will win big in November and hold both houses.
Only if they rig the voting machines.
R
RonB
RonB pulled this Usenet face plant:
As much as Microsoft bugs me, they are far from inconsequential, even
ignoring Windows (and MS Office and the "apps" that can be written with
it).
Which is why I wrote "becoming" inconsequential. You'll have to admit
their "big events" are not nearly as big as they used to be.
R
RonB
That was sarcasm.
I understood that -- just making my point that it doesn't matter who is
there. Both Republicans and Democrats are crooked sell-outs.
V
Valorie *~
chrisv said:Wrong.
Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?
The dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?
B
bugbuster
The dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?
They only had 60 votes for a short time. And the Republicans used
blocks and secret blocks to bring the Senate to a halt. The crazy
Senate rules allow a single senator to block a vote (even a vote for
cloture) without having to identify himself.
Bug
V
Valorie *~
bugbuster said:They only had 60 votes for a short time. And the Republicans used
blocks and secret blocks to bring the Senate to a halt. The crazy
Senate rules allow a single senator to block a vote (even a vote for
cloture) without having to identify himself.
A year and a half is a short time? They could have passed anything they
wanted. Their legislation was blocked or delayed by fellow democrats!
The kings of filibuster were the democrats during 6 of the Bush years.
B
bd
Wrong.
Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?
If that is the case, why didn't they filibuster the health care debacle?
B
bd
I understood that -- just making my point that it doesn't matter who is
there. Both Republicans and Democrats are crooked sell-outs.
Unfortunately, that is true. I'm just hoping we get some true statesmen
(women) in the ranks sometime soon.
C
Chris Ahlstrom
RonB pulled this Usenet face plant:
The bizznizzmen don't care about those ;->
Which is why I wrote "becoming" inconsequential. You'll have to admit
their "big events" are not nearly as big as they used to be.
The bizznizzmen don't care about those ;->