VIDEO- Funeral Director Saw No Signs of Fight on Trayvon’s Hands

[Big Steel]

He shot at an unarmed person without any reason - now what would you call
that?


What the hell as that got to do with shooting an unarmed boy?


Or attended a self control therapist - you're just trying to find excuses as
to how the bloke can get off a murder charge.

Oh and by the way, it only takes one time to shoot someone. So I don't
even know what the hell DanS is babbling about.

Has he shot someone before?
Did he he shoot the gun publicly?

That's some long tall Sally reaching!

 

[DanS]

The two police station videos cast doubt, to me anyway, on
the claims of a bloody nose, head banged on pavement, and
even the claim of rolling around on the ground. GZ's nose
shows no signs of bleeding, the back of his head looks
fine, thanks to his extra-short haircut, and his jacket
doesn't look wet or dirty.

I could easily be wrong, but it seems to me those claims
only came out after it became apparent that there were no
eyewitnesses that would disprove them. I assume it'll all
come out at trial, if it gets that far.

I had heard that that was his story from the start. I had read
article after article saying that, and then after a few days,
it was reported as "new" information that was released. I was
like, "huh?", but I read that days ago.

 

[DanS]

He shot at an unarmed person without any reason - now what
would you call that?

I don't know what to call it, a tragedy, a mistake, self-
defense, murder, I don't know. We will all find out when this
goes to trial.

What the hell as that got to do with shooting an unarmed
boy?

It doens't. It has to do with the use of "trigger-happy" as a
description.

Or attended a self control therapist - you're just trying
to find excuses as to how the bloke can get off a murder
charge.

Hardly. I was asking you how this fit the definition of
"trigger-happy".

Anyway, since Big Steel went off the deep end and seems to
believe eveything he's told by the msm.....

Here's the latest story on how the media intentionally turned
this into racial thing.....

<http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/trayvon-martin-nbc-
news-editing-911-call-306359>

If you think this makes no difference to perception of this,
you've *got* to be kidding.

 

[DanS]

I also suggest you not engage DanS. There is something not
quite right about him too.

Actually, "They're usually too disgusting, angry, irrational
and/or disconnected from reality to reason with.".....

......describes _you_ exactly, as I initially said when you
were starting out on this rampage. You kept posting and
reposting your same rant on how "he's "gonna fry" no matter
what happens, blah, blah, blah".....

I don't know about the disgusting part, but everything I have
posted has been very rational, based on the *known* facts,
instead of the hyped up media accounts...I've pointed you to
those *known* facts, and gave you the opportunity to review
them for yourself. I'm sure you haven't. And you haven't
looked, because you are afraid I may be right about the msm
swing on it, and that you will realize you *have been* duped.

I haven't yet looked this morning if anything new cropped up
overnight, but the last update I saw was that NBC edited the
audio of the 911 tape to make it sound more "exciting", more
"entertaining", far more "racial", than the actual
unadulterated evidence suggests.

Did you look at that link I posted yesterday about NBC? Do you
agree the editing made the perception different from what the
orignal audio is?

Of course you haven't. There's just nooooo way NBC would do
that, right?

Yeah, OK.

(Note: That's all I've been saying this entire time. I believe
the media has a responsibility to present the case as it is,
not edited to their liking to influence reaction one way or
another. It's just too bad you don't like it.)

 

[DanS]

Yeah, Zimmerman is going to jail. He's not getting out of
this. They will get him on manslaughter by the state or the
Federal government is going to get him on civil rights
violation. Let me say this, if this had been a black man
who was the watch person and the person killed was a white
teen, the black man would be in jail. I don't care if he
used the Florida stand your grounds right law and
self-defense. He would be in jail.

Sure....ya think?. Here's a case from Buffalo, NY that says
otherwise.....

<http://wn.com/a_18-
year_old_white_man_was_beaten_with_a_concrete_brick_by_10
_black_men_for_dating_a_black_girl>

<http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/beating_victims_family_demands_a
ction_090907>

And here are two of the participants, finally sentenced, but
not with any "hate crime" status, AND, they blamed it on a **
12 year old** they were with that also participated. So, to
all those who think a 17-year old is still a "boy", a "child",
and can't "do anything", how about a 12 year old?

The couple said they were taunted about their relationship,
and had been the targets of racial slurs and so on...yet there
"wasn't enough evidence to support this was racially
motivated?".

http://buffalo.ynn.com/content/all_news/505267/teens-
sentenced-for-gang-assault/

And, I saw the victim on the news 6 months ago, still sounding
like a 1/2 vegetable....and he had to re-learn everything from
talking to walking to feeding himself.

 

[Big Steel]

<http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2...eams-were-not-george-zimmermans-2-experts-say>

<copied>

The voice heard crying for help on a 911 call just before Trayvon Martin
was shot to death was not that of George Zimmerman, according to two
forensic voice identification experts, the Orlando Sentinel reported
Saturday.

<end>