A
ArtReid
If so, how is this feat accomplished?
Thanks
Thanks
If so, how is this feat accomplished?
Thanks
If so, how is this feat accomplished?
Thanks
If so, how is this feat accomplished?
Thanks
I usually end up copying and pasting right fields in to Word for printing.
I usually end up copying and pasting right fields in to Word for printing.
Don't buck the system; keep on doing that.
A_C
kreed said:"Ed Cryer" wrote in message
That's a setting for your printer.
Do a print from Outlook, printer page comes up, something like
"Prefernces" and "paper type".
My Lexmark has several envelope types.
Ed
**********************************************
Not that simple!
Outlook offers limited output styles such as Memo
and doesn't offer the correct fields for printing an address on an envelope.
I usually end up copying and pasting right fields in to Word for printing.
If you have a lot to do you could create a mail merge in Word.
But this is an option that is sadly lacking in Outlook, even 2010.
K
kreed said:"Ed Cryer" wrote in message
That's a setting for your printer.
Do a print from Outlook, printer page comes up, something like
"Prefernces" and "paper type".
My Lexmark has several envelope types.
Ed
**********************************************
Not that simple!
Outlook offers limited output styles such as Memo
and doesn't offer the correct fields for printing an address on an
envelope.
I usually end up copying and pasting right fields in to Word for printing.
If you have a lot to do you could create a mail merge in Word.
But this is an option that is sadly lacking in Outlook, even 2010.
K
Certainly useful but hardly worth it for a one or two-off envelope since
you have to arrange a folder with the addresses.
My own use of snail mail envelopes is mostly limited to those few
companies where sending a paper check is necessary (sometimes that
includes the US and State governments if I've lost the reply envelope.)
The Outlook Contacts list is available to me in Word.
I do remember that I had a letter template that was adjusted to put the
address below a transparent window in the envelope when I used snail
mail a lot with an old impact printer. I guess I've still not disposed
of all those window envelopes.
In general, that's about as fast a way as any, especially if you have
desktop shortcut to open Word.
James Silverton, Potomac
*********************************************************
TWO applications to address an envelope, not what you call cutting edge.
Char Jackson said:In Outlook's defense, though, addressing envelopes seems to be
somewhat of a fringe case, wouldn't you say? I've been using Outlook
since about 1997 and have never considered using it to address an
envelope, nor have I heard anyone around me mention such a task. Word
is the usual tool for that.
TWO applications to address an envelope, not what you call cutting edge.
Certainly useful but hardly worth it for a one or two-off envelope since
you have to arrange a folder with the addresses.
My own use of snail mail envelopes is mostly limited to those few
companies where sending a paper check is necessary (sometimes that
includes the US and State governments if I've lost the reply envelope.)
The Outlook Contacts list is available to me in Word.
I do remember that I had a letter template that was adjusted to put the
address below a transparent window in the envelope when I used snail
mail a lot with an old impact printer. I guess I've still not disposed
of all those window envelopes.
Prat. Maybe you should stick to playing the Kazoo.
It wasn't me that raised the question, I was only expressing an opinion.
Contact Management would suggest one should be able to manage one's
contacts, and contact them using whichever medium one chooses.
K
Not much call for it. FWIW, Outlook doesn't support semaphore or smoke
signals either.