On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:59:05 -0400, Paul wrote:
> Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:15:58 -0400, Paul wrote:
>>
>>> Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:16:28 -0400, StargateFan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Although I can't access the registry to make any changes as it's a
>>>>> work computer, does anyone know how to change this behaviour? Win98SE
>>>>> was the best for allowing users complete control whereas XP starting
>>>>> deciding what we could and couldn't work with easily. But at home
>>>>> with XP, no problem. I wrested control back from XP by installing
>>>>> great freeware Unlocker a long time back and anything WinXP or other
>>>>> programs has its grip on, I release with Unlocker then I can rename,
>>>>> move, delete, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> But other than doing a very tedious workaround at work via deleting
>>>>> via CMD DOSbox, haven't figured out how to tell Win7 that I'm in
>>>>> command and not it. Something like 19 out of 20 files/folders it
>>>>> won't release. I finally figured out that I can actually move these
>>>>> files so I move them to my flash drive and delete there via "DOS" (UNC
>>>>> paths are giving me problems with my scripting language as I haven't
>>>>> figured out how to work with them yet, whereas my flash drive has a
>>>>> drive letter that I can deal with).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any tips that don't involve registry and/or adminstrator rights, which
>>>>> I don't have? One should be able to rename, delete files at will when
>>>>> necessary and Win7 is making this unnecessarily difficult.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, any way to empty the recyle bin? Clean up manager doesn't do a
>>>>> thing. I have to move things out of recycle bin and delete with them
>>>>> in the same "DOS" way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thx.
>>>> Are you sure that your IT staff hasn't set up policies to make it work
>>>> like this?
>>>>
>>>> And have you asked *them* to help?
>>> Any IT people I've worked with, are only too pleased to explain the
>>> traps they've set up on the computer :-) I'd start with your IT department
>>> first, just because of the time it will save. If they've "cut off all
>>> avenues of escape", there's no point "running around" :-)
>>>
>>> "There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt
>>> to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. If we
>>> wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish
>>> to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We will control
>>> the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We can roll the
>>> image, make it flutter. We can change the focus to a soft blur
>>> or sharpen it to crystal clarity. For the next hour, sit quietly
>>> and we will control all that you see and hear..."
>>>
>>> (from the intro of the Outer Limits)
>>>
>>> :-)
>>> Paul
>>
>> Were you letting yourself have fun *again*?
>>
>> I'm not so sure about the utility of that in TV, but in company computer
>> networks it's pretty vital to have certain restrictions (there I am,
>> preaching to the choir again!).
>>
>
> It all depends on whether there is good reason for the rules that are
> in place, or it's just arbitrary.
>
> Not being able to delete your own Trash bin, seems a bit extreme.
> And I can't imagine what that would be preventing.
>
> Paul
It might prevent immunity from surveillance by management :-)
The fact that one rule makes little sense doesn't prove that there's no
basis for the rest of the rules.
--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
|