Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

Users Choose 64-bit Version of Windows 7 Over 32-bit Version

 
 
Nibiru2012 Nibiru2012 is offline
Quick Scotty, beam me up!
Nibiru2012's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Planet X
Posts: 4,739
Thanked: 1055
 
      02-16-2010
For the 1st time in computing history a 64 bit version of Operating System is getting more user response than its 32 bit version.And its Windows 7. Recent statistics have shown that Windows 7 64 bit is starting to make headway against 32 bit OS.


These Operating Systems have a presence:
Windows XP 32 bit (-2.62%) 42.15%
Windows 7 64 bit (+3.89%) 19.50%
Windows Vista 32 bit (-1.62%) 19.09%

These Operating Systems have less than 10%:

Windows 7 32 bit (+1.58%) 9.03%
Windows Vista 64 bit (-1.18%) 8.82%

These Operating systems are almost insignificant:

Windows XP 64 bit (-0.01%) 0.63%
Windows 2003 64 bit (-0.07%) 0.57%
Windows 2000 (0.00%) 0.10%
Other (+0.02%) 0.10%

While 32 bit XP is still dominant in the market with about 42%, Windows 7 64 bit is now at nearly 20%.

Following that bit of news is also another interesting piece of information about CPU’s. The Quad-4 combination is making inroads.

1 cpu (+0.21%) 18.29%
2 cpus (-0.37%) 56.56%
3 cpus (+0.01%) 0.96%
4 cpus (+0.14%) 24.13%
8 cpus (+0.01%) 0.06%

Advantages Of 64 bit OS
Note that the two biggest CPU chips with market share are the 2 and 4 CPU chip systems.

This means that as 64 bit OS’s increase in demand, so does the increase in the integrating hardware to make them more robust.

64-bit processors have twice the number of registers to work with, so they can process twice as much information per clock cycle as 32-bit processors. But to take advantage of the processors you need 64 bit software, either the OS or programs, and ideally both.

The Software – RAM ceiling

Typically applications have been written to address the memory space available to a 32-bit processor, but reaches the maximum limit 4GB. Thus if a system has more RAM than that, any applications that are designed to work with a 32-bit processor will not be able to interact with any memory beyond 4GB. On the other hand, applications that are written for a 64-bit operation will be able to access and store up to 16 exabytes — that’s 16 billion GB of data in RAM. That is why 64-64 is the best way to go, and why applications are looking to take advantage of the environment that they find themselves in. This move towards increasing the market share of 64 bit OS makes sense as applications try to take advantage of their working CPU.


So its obvious that as the increasement of people's PC configuration, the market share of 64 bit must be increased by the time.unless you can not utilize your harware ability to work.

Source: Steam Hardware Survey
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Thrax Thrax is offline
Super Moderator
Thrax's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit Metro
Posts: 926
Thanked: 262
Send a message via ICQ to Thrax Send a message via AIM to Thrax Thrax's Twitter Pag
 
      02-16-2010
It's about #$%@ing time.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
Ian's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: England
Posts: 3,091
Thanked: 450
Ian's Twitter Pag
 
      02-16-2010
Very interesting post, the Steam hardware survey is an interesting reflection of gamers hardware.

Like Thrax said, it's about time that 64-bit is pulling ahead... 9 years since XP x64!
 
Reply With Quote
 
catilley1092 catilley1092 is offline
Win 7/Linux Mint Lover
catilley1092's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,510
Thanked: 510
 
      02-17-2010
I believe it, too! Look in the sales ads in Sunday's papers, especially Best Buy. The first few pages are laptops and PC's, all 64 bit Home Premium Windows 7 systems. One or two Mac's sometimes. I've seen only a few 32 bit systems that's new, they were in the online stores. I don't know why this particular one was so expensive, it was a Panasonic Toughbook with a 32 bit Vista OS, 2GB RAM, weird looking, almost octagon shape, for $3,700. I can't see paying that much for a 32 bit laptop.
 
Reply With Quote
 
DallasDad DallasDad is offline
Established Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 216
Thanked: 29
 
      02-20-2010
Thats not surprising since HP and Dell won't even build a 32 bit system anymore.
 
Reply With Quote
 
linuxdudex12 linuxdudex12 is offline
Established Member
linuxdudex12's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 158
Thanked: 19
 
      02-20-2010
Great research Nibiru2012
 
Reply With Quote
 
Veedaz Veedaz is offline
~
Veedaz's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,988
Thanked: 329
 
      02-20-2010
There is no doubt 64-bit computing in the home is becoming more popular, thankfully computing goes forward not backward
 
Reply With Quote
 
catilley1092 catilley1092 is offline
Win 7/Linux Mint Lover
catilley1092's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,510
Thanked: 510
 
      02-20-2010
There's no going back now. 64 bit is the standard in today's computers, and it's high time. Microsoft introduced it with XP Pro, what, 8 or 9 years ago? Why it wasn't jumped on then, or shortly after, I don't know the answer. Mabye there wasn't enough interest in it, and upgrading your computer was more costly at that time. The RAM limitation with 32 bit probably played some part in the OEM's starting to take 64 bit seriously. Whatever the reason(s), we're moving forward now, and at a fast pace. It will be interesting to see what is offered in 2012, and especially 2015-16.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Rob in Japan Rob in Japan is offline
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8
Thanked: 1
 
      02-21-2010
The problem with going over to 64-bit 8-9 years ago wasn't the industry, it was consumers. Keep in mind that the poeple on a forum like this are gamers or IT specialists and upgrade/replace their PCs frequently as new tech is introduced. Many people, the majority in fact, don't upgrade unless they have no other option. My father had a Windows ME box until about September last year when it finally died and the company I worked at 9 years ago still used OS2!

Last edited by Rob in Japan; 02-22-2010 at 10:17 AM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
DallasDad DallasDad is offline
Established Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 216
Thanked: 29
 
      02-23-2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob in Japan View Post
The problem with going over to 64-bit 8-9 years ago wasn't the industry, it was consumers. Keep in mind that the poeple on a forum like this are gamers or IT specialists and upgrade/replace their PCs frequently as new tech is introduced. Many people, the majority in fact, don't upgrade unless they have no other option. My father had a Windows ME box until about September last year when it finally died and the company I worked at 9 years ago still used OS2!
I think thats a fair point Rob. A lot of people never found the need for 6 or 8 gig of ram, otherwise it would've come to pass sooner.

Last edited by DallasDad; 02-23-2010 at 07:33 AM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to Install Windows 7 davehc Software 0 08-16-2010 03:50 PM
Windows 7 Annoyances Nibiru2012 General Discussion 6 03-17-2010 07:17 PM
Clean Install Windows 7 with Upgrade Media Nibiru2012 Installation, Setup and Updates 0 12-22-2009 08:03 PM
Clean Install Windows 7 with Upgrade Media Nibiru2012 Installation, Setup and Updates 2 12-04-2009 07:30 PM
Important Issues in This Release Candidate of Windows 7 Ian News 0 05-05-2009 04:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 AM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33