In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Yousuf Khan <> wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 6:31 PM, Arno wrote:
>>> However, the fact that all of the administrator accounts were disabled,
>>> while the non-admin accounts were fine does lead me to believe perhaps
>>> someone was trying to seize the machine. However, the machine was behind
>>> a NAT router, so it's hard to understand how they planned to take over
>>> this machine.
>>
>> Hmm. Maybe they hacked the NAT first? Would not be the first time.
>> Anyways, good success with the cleanup.
> Well, I don't know how they can, the firewall is inside a Dlink
> broadband router with all external interfaces turned off. It's not the
> well-known hackable Linksys WRT54G router.
> I'm going through the event logs right now, but it's a needle in a
> haystack. Where would I notice unauthorized access? Will it even leave a
> trace in the event logs? There were several errors, warnings, and
> criticals during the time period in question, but that's no different
> than what was there before that time period.
You can try a different appoach: Seach for known vulnerabilities
for this device.
It is quite possible that the logs will not help.
Arno
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email:
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans