Updated mah ports!

[Justin]

w00t!

Justins-MacBook:~ justin$ sudo port upgrade outdated
---> Computing dependencies for xorg-libX11
---> Fetching xorg-libX11
---> Attempting to fetch libX11-1.4.0.tar.bz2 from
http://lil.fr.distfiles.macports.org/xorg-libX11
---> Verifying checksum(s) for xorg-libX11
---> Extracting xorg-libX11
---> Configuring xorg-libX11
---> Building xorg-libX11
---> Staging xorg-libX11 into destroot
---> Computing dependencies for xorg-libX11
---> Installing xorg-libX11 @1.4.0_1
---> Deactivating xorg-libX11 @1.3.6_1
---> Cleaning xorg-libX11
---> Activating xorg-libX11 @1.4.0_1
---> Cleaning xorg-libX11
---> Computing dependencies for boost
---> Fetching boost
---> Attempting to fetch boost_1_45_0.tar.bz2 from
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/boost
---> Verifying checksum(s) for boost
---> Extracting boost
---> Configuring boost
---> Building boost
---> Staging boost into destroot
---> Computing dependencies for boost
---> Installing boost @1.45.0_0
---> Deactivating boost @1.44.0_0
---> Cleaning boost
---> Activating boost @1.45.0_0
---> Cleaning boost
---> Fetching m4
---> Verifying checksum(s) for m4
---> Extracting m4
---> Configuring m4
---> Building m4
---> Staging m4 into destroot
---> Installing m4 @1.4.15_2
---> Deactivating m4 @1.4.15_1
---> Cleaning m4
---> Activating m4 @1.4.15_2
---> Cleaning m4
---> Computing dependencies for curl-ca-bundle
---> Fetching curl-ca-bundle
---> Attempting to fetch certdata-1.69.txt from
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/security/nss/lib/ckfw/builtins/cert
data.txt?raw=1&dummy=
---> Verifying checksum(s) for curl-ca-bundle
---> Extracting curl-ca-bundle
---> Applying patches to curl-ca-bundle
---> Configuring curl-ca-bundle
---> Building curl-ca-bundle
---> Staging curl-ca-bundle into destroot
---> Computing dependencies for curl-ca-bundle
---> Installing curl-ca-bundle @7.21.2_3
---> Deactivating curl-ca-bundle @7.21.2_2
---> Cleaning curl-ca-bundle
---> Activating curl-ca-bundle @7.21.2_3
---> Cleaning curl-ca-bundle
Justins-MacBook:~ justin$

 

[Rob]

Gibberish-ux. As user friendly as a hand grenade up the ar5e.

 

[chrisv]

Gibberish-ux. As user friendly as a hand grenade up the ar5e.

No one is forcing you to read and understand all of the status
messages. You have the *choice* of ignoring them.

But I suppose you think everything is somehow magically more
"friendly" if the inner working of things are simply hidden from view.

 

[DanS]

Gibberish-ux. As user friendly as a hand grenade up the
ar5e.

That's not gibberish.

You don't understand English ?

What's not to understand for: Extracting xorg-libX11
Or: Verifying checksum(s) for xorg-libX11
Or: Computing dependencies for boost

 

[Sandman]

Gibberish-ux. As user friendly as a hand grenade up the
ar5e.

That's not gibberish.

You don't understand English ?

What's not to understand for: Extracting xorg-libX11
Or: Verifying checksum(s) for xorg-libX11
Or: Computing dependencies for boost[/QUOTE]

Gibberish can use english words here and there

 

[DanS]

Gibberish can use english words here and there

Yes, it can.

But those are fully understandable phrases with nearly full
sentence structure, not just random english words.

 

[Sandman]

Gibberish can use english words here and there

Yes, it can.

But those are fully understandable phrases with nearly full
sentence structure, not just random english words.[/QUOTE]

I can't find "xorg-libX11" in the dictionary, and relying on the
dictionary definition of "boosts" isn't doing you much good here.

 

[DanS]

I can't find "xorg-libX11" in the dictionary, and relying
on the dictionary definition of "boosts" isn't doing you
much good here.

Now you're getting as little ridiculous.

 

[Clogwog]

No one is forcing you to read and understand all of the status
messages. You have the *choice* of ignoring them.

But I suppose you think everything is somehow magically more
"friendly" if the inner working of things are simply hidden from view.

<stalk>
*PLONK*

 

[Tim Murray]

I can't find "xorg-libX11" in the dictionary, and relying on the
dictionary definition of "boosts" isn't doing you much good here.

Boost Mobile? Nestle Boost nutritional drink?

 

[Tim Murray]

I can't find "xorg-libX11" in the dictionary, and relying on the
dictionary definition of "boosts" isn't doing you much good here.

Boost Mobile? Nestle Boost nutritional drink?

 

[Snit]

Sandman stated in post (e-mail address removed) on
12/3/10 10:16 AM:

That's not gibberish.

You don't understand English ?

What's not to understand for: Extracting xorg-libX11
Or: Verifying checksum(s) for xorg-libX11
Or: Computing dependencies for boost

Gibberish can use english words here and there
[/QUOTE]
Heck, you are the one who claimed that complete and utter gibberish text
created with a filler text program was not "gibberish" because there were
coherent *words* in the output it created. Here is some of the text:

Organizations capable of double-loop learning, by adopting
project appraisal through incremental cash flow analysis,
whenever single-loop learning strategies go wrong. Defensive
reasoning, the doom loop and doom zoom to experience a
profound paradigm shift, in order to build a shared view of
what can be improved. Empowerment of all personnel, not just
key operatives, from binary cause and effect to complex
patterns, taking full cognizance of organizational learning
parameters and principles. 

Complete and utter gibberish. But here is what you said of it:

The text comes from the Lorum Ipsum plugin in DreamWeaver,
but it's hardly gibberish.
...
So, in short, the above paragraph is fully intelligible, even
though I'm sure the Lorem Ipsum author that set this as the
"corporate" template for their plugin probably just cut'n'pasted
it from some company analyst presentation and deemed it
"unintelligble corporate speak", not being familiar with double
loop learning.

But it *is* gibberish. Heck, Sandman, you even have a page on your
dishonest trolling site all about this:

<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>

Sandman even defines gibberish:

unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense

And that is *exactly* what that text is. Gibberish. Even Sandman says:

The text in question is indeed created by this plugin and is
indeed just random sentences thrown together.

In other words, gibberish. But Sandman *also* denies it.

 

[Snit]

Sandman stated in post (e-mail address removed) on
12/5/10 1:03 AM:

Yes, it can.

But those are fully understandable phrases with nearly full
sentence structure, not just random english words.

I can't find "xorg-libX11" in the dictionary, and relying on the
dictionary definition of "boosts" isn't doing you much good here.
[/QUOTE]
Coherency is not just about using real words, it is about being coherent.
Heck, you even define gibberish on your dishonest troll site as:

<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense

Come on, Sandman, you have been trying to figure this out for years - why
are you still so confused?

 

[Big Crotch on a Small Fish]

Sandman stated in post (e-mail address removed) on
12/5/10 1:03 AM:

Coherency is not just about using real words, it is about being
coherent. Heck, you even define gibberish on your dishonest troll
site as:

<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense

Come on, Sandman, you have been trying to figure this out for years -
why are you still so confused?

Why can't you figure it out, gluey?

 

[Big Crotch on a Small Fish]

Sandman stated in post (e-mail address removed) on
12/3/10 10:16 AM:

Heck, you are the one who claimed that complete and utter gibberish
text created with a filler text program was not "gibberish" because
there were coherent *words* in the output it created. Here is some
of the text:

Organizations capable of double-loop learning, by adopting
project appraisal through incremental cash flow analysis,
whenever single-loop learning strategies go wrong. Defensive
reasoning, the doom loop and doom zoom to experience a
profound paradigm shift, in order to build a shared view of
what can be improved. Empowerment of all personnel, not just
key operatives, from binary cause and effect to complex
patterns, taking full cognizance of organizational learning
parameters and principles.

Complete and utter gibberish. But here is what you said of it:

The text comes from the Lorum Ipsum plugin in DreamWeaver,
but it's hardly gibberish.
...
So, in short, the above paragraph is fully intelligible, even
though I'm sure the Lorem Ipsum author that set this as the
"corporate" template for their plugin probably just cut'n'pasted
it from some company analyst presentation and deemed it
"unintelligble corporate speak", not being familiar with double
loop learning.

But it *is* gibberish. Heck, Sandman, you even have a page on your
dishonest trolling site all about this:

<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>

Sandman even defines gibberish:

unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense

And that is *exactly* what that text is. Gibberish. Even Sandman
says:

The text in question is indeed created by this plugin and is
indeed just random sentences thrown together.

In other words, gibberish. But Sandman *also* denies it.

How long are you going to keep pulling up ancient debates?

 

[Sandman]

Now you're getting as little ridiculous.

I think verbosity is user hostile. Especially when displaying strange
things like "checksums" and "dependencies" which the user has no use
of knowing what so ever.