Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

Some new A/V & Internet Security Ratings

 
 
Nibiru2012 Nibiru2012 is offline
Quick Scotty, beam me up!
Nibiru2012's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Planet X
Posts: 4,852
Thanked: 1073
 
      04-20-2010
From: Matousec.com

For me, I find some of these results quite interesting. I stumbled upon this while doing some AV research and checking on ratings, etc.

Thrax may find this interesting too, plus he may have more feedback regarding this website as I have never really heard or seen much about it.


Products' ratings





The article is rather long and extensive. I suggest going to their website to read all the particulars.

http://www.matousec.com/projects/pro...ge/results.php

Last edited by Nibiru2012; 04-20-2010 at 04:09 PM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
catilley1092 catilley1092 is offline
Win 7/Linux Mint Lover
catilley1092's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,507
Thanked: 511
 
      04-20-2010
Does this website have any financial interest in the above AV's that's listed? Even the one you like (ESET) is in the "not recommended" list. Avira, Windows Live One Care, ThreatFire and Avast 5.0 deserves higher ratings, also. I ran Avast for a long time (still do), I know firsthand it's better. You probably feel the same about ESET. When I get a chance, I'll research this site carefully. To begin with, they start with a clean install of XP SP3 w/IE8 installed. How does that compare with today? If you or I had the time, we could compile a similar report with the results we (or the sponsor) wants. Why don't they conduct the tests on a modern OS, such as Windows 7. I know firsthand that a lot of crap will be found on XP. When they reperform the tests on Windows 7, I'll take another look.

Last edited by catilley1092; 04-20-2010 at 08:42 PM.. Reason: discovered and added information
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nibiru2012 Nibiru2012 is offline
Quick Scotty, beam me up!
Nibiru2012's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Planet X
Posts: 4,852
Thanked: 1073
 
      04-20-2010
Apparently they're not paid by anyone. I just found it interesting, that's all.

I put more trust in the following site than I do any other. It's the one Thrax uses.

Welcome to AV-Comparatives.org

On this site you will find independent comparatives of Anti-Virus software. All products listed in our comparatives are already a selection of some very good anti-virus products. In order to get included in our main tests, vendors must fulfill various conditions and minimum requirements.

The following products are tested in the current main comparatives:

avast! Free Antivirus 5.0
AVG Anti-Virus 9.0
AVIRA AntiVir Premium 9
BitDefender Antivirus 2010
eScan Anti-Virus 10
ESET NOD32 Anti-Virus 4.0
F-Secure Anti-Virus 2010
G DATA AntiVirus 2010
K7 TotalSecurity 10.0 (new)
Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2010
Kingsoft Antivirus 2010
McAfee AntiVirus Plus 2010
Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0
Norman Antivirus & Anti-Spyware 7.30
Panda Antivirus Pro 2010 (new)
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AV 7.0 (new)
Sophos Anti-Virus 9.0
Symantec Norton Anti-Virus 2010
Trend Micro AntiVirus plus AntiSpyware 2010 (new)
TrustPort Antivirus 2010

Look into the Comparatives section to find out additional tests and reviews. If you plan to buy an Anti-Virus, please visit the vendor's site and evaluate their software by downloading a trial version, as there are also many other features (e.g. firewall, HIPS, behaviorblocker, etc.) and important things (e.g. price, graphical user interface, compatibility, etc.) for an Anti-Virus that you should evaluate by yourself. Even if quite important, the data provided in the test reports on this site are just some aspects that you should consider when buying Anti-Virus software.

http://www.av-comparatives.org/


On-demand Comparative Report - February 2010 Report (PDF - english)
 
Reply With Quote
 
yodap yodap is offline
No longer shovelling
yodap's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,307
Thanked: 245
 
      04-22-2010
McCrappy screws up big time.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=2003&tag=nl.e589
 
Reply With Quote
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is offline
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 931
 
      04-22-2010
McAfee and Norton are two that I don't want any dealings with.
 
Reply With Quote
 
catilley1092 catilley1092 is offline
Win 7/Linux Mint Lover
catilley1092's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,507
Thanked: 511
 
      04-22-2010
I'll research and go with my own opinion, that's the way I've always done, and that's the way that I'll always be. If you have a test machine, try one you're interested in on that. That way, you don't screw up your main system.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible pact between Google, Verizon would create Internet class system Nibiru2012 Off-Topic Discussion 1 08-08-2010 02:47 AM
New attack bypasses EVERY Windows security product Jeffreyobrien Security 14 05-19-2010 04:11 AM
Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 in Win 7 Professional & XP Mode? Ancient Lady Security 20 03-13-2010 03:55 AM
Windows 7 & Internet 8 & Yahoo mail security mtheriault Windows 7 Support 5 12-27-2009 05:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 AM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33