On 4/6/2011 12:15 PM, ray wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:57:58 -0400, Big Steel wrote:
>
>> On 4/6/2011 11:53 AM, ray wrote:
>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:39:27 +0200, Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/06/2011 05:30 PM, Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote:
>>>>> Percival P. Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/06/11 10:36 am, Chief Scratchum wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <rant> I left the Windows Live Essential Update KB2434419 run all
>>>>>>> night and it still hadn't progressed but maybe 1/8 of the way, so I
>>>>>>> cancelled it. Lo and behold, when I closed the update window, there
>>>>>>> was another windows hidden behind it asking if I wanted to update
>>>>>>> the whole Live Essentials Suite or just the parts of it that were
>>>>>>> previously installed. So why did that window not appear on *TOP* of
>>>>>>> the update window where you could SEE the f&%k*#ing thing?!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And why is Bill Gates running around giving our money away instead
>>>>>>> of giving some of it back to us!</rant>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That happened to me today with the IE9 installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> When things seem to be hung up like that, I move the relevant window
>>>>> aside to see if there is something hidden behind it.
>>>>
>>>> So do I.
>>>
>>> Seems to me that one shouldn't have to do that on a modern OS.
>>
>> Total nonsense, the application was waiting for a user response. How in
>> the hell could the application be hung, if the applications is waiting
>> for a user response? And besides, all one has to do in look at the Task
>> Bar to see what is running.
>
> Seems to me that one shouldn't have to do that for a system update on a
> modern OS.
What? That something requiring a user response to proceed is going to be
halted until it gets a response to proceed or not?
Yeah there are a whole lot of things that are modern. Just because
something is modern does it mean they all work the same way?
|