Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

PCI-E Version 3 Released!

 
 
WindowsGeek WindowsGeek is offline
Member
WindowsGeek's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 90
Thanked: 5
 
      08-09-2011
MSI recently released PCI Express v3! You know what this means... expect great things from ATI/AMD&nVidia in the upcoming months. However the new tech seems to be exclusively on Intel-chipped boards. I don't think that AMD will have an answer to this for a while, though it looks as though it will be worth the wait. I need a new board anyway

This board seems to be definitely worth it, aside from only having 4 RAM slots (compared to other Intel boards having 6-8.)

Here is the link, for those who have interest:
http://us.msi.com/service/z68g3/

Any thoughts?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is online now
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 931
 
      08-10-2011
I just read about a tech that should be finalized by the end of the year.

SATA-IO Specs to Come: SATA Express, for SSDs and Hybrid Drives
Quote:
The SATA Express specification provides SSD and hybrid drive manufacturers the advantages of performance and scalability enabled by PCIe 3.0 - which is available now - and the ubiquity of SATA," said Mladen Luksic, SATA-IO president. "We expect the SATA Express specification to be completed by the end of 2011.
  • SATA 3.0 = 6GB
  • SATA-Express on PCIe 2.0 = 8GB (I understand this to be one lane of traffic)
  • SATA-Express on PCIe 3.0 = 16GB (I understand this to be two lanes of traffic)

If more bandwidth is needed in the future more lanes can be easily added at that time.

P.S.
What next USB-Express?
It certainly would not surprise me, not after reading about SATA-Express.
 
Reply With Quote
 
WindowsGeek WindowsGeek is offline
Member
WindowsGeek's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 90
Thanked: 5
 
      08-10-2011
Interesting post! Perhaps next we will see faster LAN speeds. 16GB/sec LAN would not be a bad thing. It would certainly take advantage of faster HDD speeds for file transfers.

Anyways I understand that SATA-Express will max out the bandwidth of your PCI-E lanes, as the bandwidths listed are consistent with the maximum bandwidths of the PCI-E lanes. It seems odd that there isn't any speed lost due to processing on the card, but perhaps I am wrong.

Also what would be the use of these new platforms? I understand the 8GB/sec but not 16 yet, as I have not seen any drives of any type come close to that kind of bandwidth unless you have a striping pattern straight out of Hell itself. The only thing I have seen come anywhere close to the max of current SATA platforms would be my server itself, with 8 drives (at 10K-15K RPM) all in a RAID5 array.

But hey, a faster bus can make anything possible! Why not do something that can be done?
 
Reply With Quote
 
shadowalk shadowalk is offline
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 87
Thanked: 12
 
      08-11-2011
I knew it was a good idea to stick to my 5770. Perhaps I may look into the some of the upcoming Radeon HD 7xxx series cards in the coming months.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kougar Kougar is offline
OCing one chip at a time
Kougar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Thanked: 94
 
      08-12-2011
PCI Express 3 is interesting... but keep in mind that even a single dual-GPU graphics card can't max out a PCI Express 2.0 16x port. The new standard shouldn't boost graphics performance unless the system is electrically bottlenecked to an 8x slot or some fancy multi-GPU setups are going on, or even a combination of both.

Clifford, ya saw that too eh? That link about SATA Express is extremely intriguing... unlike PCIe 2.0, SATA 3.0 (6Gbps) slots are brand new and are within 12 months of being maxed out by a single SSD, so the need for a better standard is there and gains are to be had. I can't wait to see what SATA Express will offer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clifford_cooley View Post
I just read about a tech that should be finalized by the end of the year.

SATA-IO Specs to Come: SATA Express, for SSDs and Hybrid Drives
  • SATA 3.0 = 6GB
  • SATA-Express on PCIe 2.0 = 8GB (I understand this to be one lane of traffic)
  • SATA-Express on PCIe 3.0 = 16GB (I understand this to be two lanes of traffic)

If more bandwidth is needed in the future more lanes can be easily added at that time.
SATA 3.0 is a 6 Gigabit per second slot. PCI Express is in Bytes... so if you want to compare them, SATA 3 has a theoretical maximum of 750MB/s. Accounting for protocol overhead, the maximum users can expect is somewhere around the 550-650 MB/s range...

Quote:
Originally Posted by clifford_cooley View Post
P.S.
What next USB-Express?
It certainly would not surprise me, not after reading about SATA-Express.
Actually, you aren't far off. Try this: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/...-a-reality.ars
 
Reply With Quote
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is online now
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 931
 
      08-12-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kougar View Post
SATA 3.0 is a 6 Gigabit per second slot. PCI Express is in Bytes... so if you want to compare them, SATA 3 has a theoretical maximum of 750MB/s
Ouch - I didn't catch the bit/byte difference.

That would be a hefty increase over SATA even on PCIe 2.0.
 
Reply With Quote
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is online now
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 931
 
      08-12-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kougar View Post
SATA 3.0 is a 6 Gigabit per second slot. PCI Express is in Bytes... so if you want to compare them, SATA 3 has a theoretical maximum of 750MB/s.
Are you sure PCIe is in Bytes?

Wikilink - PCI Express
Quote:
PCI Express 2.0
PCI-SIG announced the availability of the PCI Express Base 2.0 specification on 15 January 2007.[11] The PCIe 2.0 standard doubles the per-lane throughput from the PCIe 1.0 standard's 250 MB/s to 500 MB/s.
PCI Express 3.0
Because the scrambling polynomial is known, the data can be recovered by running it through a feedback topology using the inverse polynomial"[18] and also uses a 128b/130b encoding scheme, reducing the overhead to approximately 1.5% ((130-128)/130), as opposed to the 20% overhead of 8b/10b encoding used by PCIe 2.0. PCIe 3.0's 8 GT/s bit rate effectively delivers double PCIe 2.0 bandwidth.
 
Reply With Quote
 
WindowsGeek WindowsGeek is offline
Member
WindowsGeek's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 90
Thanked: 5
 
      08-12-2011
For the record, one of my machines is running a PCIe 2.0 GPU on a PCIe 1.0 slot. Meets every benchmark of the one on a 2.0 slot, and this is not some low-end GPU either. This makes me thing whether or not PCIe 3.0 will be worth it in the near future. Perhaps someday far off we will have GPUs powerful enough to need it, but not right now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clifford_cooley
PCI Express 2.0
PCI-SIG announced the availability of the PCI Express Base 2.0 specification on 15 January 2007.[11] The PCIe 2.0 standard doubles the per-lane throughput from the PCIe 1.0 standard's 250 MB/s to 500 MB/s.
PCI Express 3.0
Because the scrambling polynomial is known, the data can be recovered by running it through a feedback topology using the inverse polynomial"[18] and also uses a 128b/130b encoding scheme, reducing the overhead to approximately 1.5% ((130-128)/130), as opposed to the 20% overhead of 8b/10b encoding used by PCIe 2.0. PCIe 3.0's 8 GT/s bit rate effectively delivers double PCIe 2.0 bandwidth.
Cliff, yes, the capitol B as in MB/sec means the measure is in bytes, and the lowercase b as in Mb/sec (Internet speeds for example) means the measure is in bits.
 
Reply With Quote
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is online now
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 931
 
      08-12-2011
My quote: "SATA-Express on PCIe 2.0 = 8GB"

Lets not get confused, Kougar was telling me that the 8GB in my quote is 8 Gigabytes. That is not what I have been reading everywhere.
 
Reply With Quote
 
WindowsGeek WindowsGeek is offline
Member
WindowsGeek's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 90
Thanked: 5
 
      08-15-2011
I always thought it was in gigabytes. I thought this because PCI-X (not Express, but X - The super long 64-bit PCI slot that nobody ever made cards for, aside from RAID cards) has a 1 Gigabyte per second bandwidth limit. So I just figured that all bus standards like PCI-E were measured in GB/sec rather than Gb/sec.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New version of GPUz released brkkab123 Software 2 06-30-2011 05:40 PM
Help with BSOD related to video card? Abortedman Windows 7 Support 20 01-14-2010 12:56 PM
Windows 7 install keeps rebooting Stephen47 Installation, Setup and Updates 32 05-24-2009 06:26 PM
Windows 7 is version actually version 6.1 Ian News 1 10-20-2008 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:04 AM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33