Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

How much would Windows 7 help me?

 
 
MikeSD MikeSD is offline
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Thanked: 0
 
      03-17-2012
I guess first I should find out if I can even install it, on my system. I assume I can but won't want to start, until I do a little research.

My Computer:
1) I have a Gatewood GM5424 (about 4 years old)
2) It's based on the Intel E6400 chipset, dual core, 2.13GHz
3) I have Vista Ultimate, SP1 installed (32bit)
4) I have 2G of RAM (8G possible with this OS)
5) 1 internal 400GB Hard Drive
6) 1 internal 1TB Hard Drive for data and backup
7) Both drives are NTFS file systems

Questions:
I plan to do a clean install. This will NOT be an upgrade. I am prepared to reinstall and reregister all my existing applications. My questions are only concerned with compatibility and performance.

1) Will Windows 7, 64bit install ok on this computer? The computer seems to meet the Windows 7 requirements.

2) Will the Windows 7 OS (64 bit) perform better, than Vista (32 bit), on a system with these resources?

3) Is there any difference in driver compatibility (or availability) on the 64 bit OS versus the 32 bit OS? This is relative to what might be in my system. I haven't added anything from the original GM5424. I know there could be compatibility on some other systems.

4) Is there any reason to stay with Vista Ultimate (32bit) over the Windows 7? What would that be?

5) I don't plan to create any special partitions nor will I have it dual boot. It will be a clean install to the 400G drive. Will both drives be affected by the install? Will I lose anything on the 1TB drive (it's data only)? That is, will the file system be changed or anything like that, that would render it erased?

Thanks,
Mike
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
TrainableMan TrainableMan is offline
^ The World's First ^
TrainableMan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,453
Thanked: 1222
 
      03-18-2012
Download and run the w7 Upgrade Advisor. Nearly every machine that can run Vista can also run W7 but your machine has to have a 64-bit capable processor to run 64-bit so run the advisor. Also if you have very old 16-bit apps, like for example the old game ski.exe, it will not run in native 64-bit (32-bit OS runs 16 & 32-bit apps, 64-bit run 32 and 64-bit apps).

Unless you feel you need some features of W7 such as AeroGlass then there is very little reason to upgrade; it's cheaper to wait till your next hardware upgrade. I think it's funny that the first feature they list is homegroups which IMO stinks because they didn't make it backwards compatible, I still use workgroups.

Yes 64-bit drivers are different and if they are not available for your old hardware, such as printers, then you have to buy new or go with the 32-bit OS. Again the upgrade advisor may tell you about incompatible hardware if you turn it all on for the scan.

Will it perform better or faster than Vista? Not likely.

You must be careful to specify the install to the 400GB drive or better yet disconnect the 1TB while you install so you can't possibly make a mistake. If you install to the 400GB then the 1TB won't be touched.

Last edited by TrainableMan; 03-18-2012 at 12:44 AM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
MikeSD MikeSD is offline
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Thanked: 0
 
      03-18-2012
Thanks, while waiting for someone to reply, I did some more research and found the W7 Upgrade Advisor and it said I can upgrade to Version 7. It also pointed out potential problem with existing software. There were only two that were "incompatible" and I don't use them anyway.

I bought some DDR2 RAM today, so I'll be upgrading the RAM first. I have 4 PC-6400 RAMs so I think I can only add 2 of them to the system. I'll test the doubling of RAM with Vista (4G), before I go to the bother with Windows 7 (there I may upgrade to 8G). There really only 2 reasons I'm considering upgrading.

1) I have a quad core, Windows 7 computer at work.
2) Upgrading to 64bit Windows 7 will force me to start with a clean system.

I have spent the entire day, rounding up all my source install files, for reinstalling my software. AND verifying I have the registration keys for all of it. Now, I'm in the process of backing up my 1T drive to my external drive. Never considered just removing the drive. Duh! Good idea.

Thanks,

PS: I'm a bit confused about the DDR2 RAMs I got (Crucial). The crucial web site said something about only being able to put 4G max RAM, if I use the 6400 RAMS, but their suggestion was to add 2 6400 RAMS, in addition to my existing 2G (1+1), making 6G. Very confusing that they say 4G max, using 6400, unless they mean 4G (of 6400 RAM). Wording is not clear.

Then some people get all wrapped around the axel, about changing the timing for this computer, while others say just use what the RAMS come with. So there are mixed signals on that. I'm going to just drop them in and see how it goes.

Mike
 
Reply With Quote
 
MikeSD MikeSD is offline
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Thanked: 0
 
      03-18-2012
The other thing I wonder about

If I go with the 64 bit, I will have to boot from the DVR. With the 32bit direct upgrade, Vista has to be running, and the upgrade program can verify the vality of the "upgrade". With booting directly from DVD, for the 64bit, will the program be able to verify the validity of the "upgrade", since Vista won't be running? And it will immediately begin with a clean dirk. I ask this, because I don't think I have the original Windows install DVD. At best I might have had a recovery CD but don't know if I can even find that. I don't want any destruction to my existing OS, to only find out I can't qualify for the "upgrade". I mean, I do qualify but don't know if a boot DVR can check that validity.

Can anyone answer that?
 
Reply With Quote
 
TrainableMan TrainableMan is offline
^ The World's First ^
TrainableMan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,453
Thanked: 1222
 
      03-18-2012
Your 32-bit Vista will only see about 3.25GB of RAM no matter how much your BIOS sees. If you switched to Vista 64-bit or W7 64 that would see any extra above the 3.25 mark.

From what I see of your computer specs it says you have 4 DDR2 DIMM slots with an 8GB max; this quite probably means the most you can put in one slot is a 2GB DIMM and it may need to be in pairs (newer boards don't require pairs but I'm guessing yours would prefer or even require it). It also says you started with 2x 1GB DIMMs. So you should get 2x 2GB DDR2 DIMMs. If you get 2x then those 4GB plus your original 2 give you 6GB which is great for most people unless you are doing heavy cadcam or top-of-the-line games (which your CPU probably couldn't handle anyway). You Could buy 4x 2GB DIMMs but then you must remove the 2x 1GB originals and with the 4x 2GB you will hit your max of 8GB ... twice the money for little to no improvement.

No matter what you install you boot to the DVD and it can detect Vista on the harddrive even though it isn't booted from it. The tougher one is if you format the Vista drive first, then you may have to do a double install but still not that hard, you simply install twice.

Last edited by TrainableMan; 03-18-2012 at 05:47 AM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
MikeSD MikeSD is offline
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Thanked: 0
 
      03-18-2012
I just installed 2 of the 2G PC-6400 RAMS, giving me 6G. But exactly as you say, the system only recognizes 3.25 RAM. It sees the 6G but only makes available 3.25.

I used PassMark Performance Test SW and was amazed how suckie my computer is. At least in 3D Graphics. I downloaded a baseline results for the same CPU and found I was nearly the same as the baseline, with slight improvement in the RAM areas, since I had 3.5G and the baseline was 2G.

But on 3D graphics is was outperformed anwhere from 400% to 1500%. I have the nVIDIA 7300LE (64MB RAM) and the baseline had the nVIDIA 8300 (250MB RAM). Guess I could upgrade the graphics processor, or just add more memory. It can take up to 250MB. On the "simple" 3D graphics, my computer scored 25. The baseline scored 1309. 2D was on par with the baeline results.

It looks like the only upgrade route might be to 64 bit Version 7, which would allow me to have 8G RAM. I bought 4 of the PC-6400 RAMS, so I will have a full set.

Just for grins, I'm going to install the Passmark program on my work computer on Monday and give it a whirl. It's a quad core, 64 bit, Version 7, gaming computer. That should be interesting.

Last edited by MikeSD; 03-18-2012 at 07:41 AM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nibiru2012 Nibiru2012 is offline
Quick Scotty, beam me up!
Nibiru2012's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Planet X
Posts: 4,956
Thanked: 1102
 
      03-18-2012
I would highly recommend that regarding your RAM sticks that you use two of the same brand and series and timings. Your system is upgradeable to a total of 8 GB of RAM. (4 DIMM slots for a total of 8 GB of RAM).

If the Crucial RAM you purchased is a matched set, even if its only 4 GB, then use it solely and don't mix in any other RAM, especially if it's another brand and especially if the timings are different; ie, 8-8-8-24 vs 8-9-8-27 and such or if the RAM frequencies are are different such as 1066MHz versus 1333MHz.

IF YOU MIX your RAM sticks the motherboard will automatically default ALL RAM settings to the lowest ones.

RAM may be very easy to configure or it can cause a lot of issues if a user makes careless assumptions about it. Too much advice is given out to users about RAM without letting them know the subtle nuances of RAM frequencies, timings, series and manufacturers.

I hope it all works out well for you. Keep us posted!

BTW, Welcome to the Windows Seven Forums website!
 
Reply With Quote
 
TrainableMan TrainableMan is offline
^ The World's First ^
TrainableMan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,453
Thanked: 1222
 
      03-18-2012
Nibs he did buy 4 sticks but his old Gateway is almost the same as mine.

I don't have settings in the BIOS for RAM timings; I just put them in in pairs with the slowest pair in Slot 0/1 and they all run at that speed.
 
Reply With Quote
 
MikeSD MikeSD is offline
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Thanked: 0
 
      03-19-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrainableMan View Post
Nibs he did buy 4 sticks but his old Gateway is almost the same as mine.

I don't have settings in the BIOS for RAM timings; I just put them in in pairs with the slowest pair in Slot 0/1 and they all run at that speed.
This is to both posters.

I did buy 4 identical Curcial RAM sticks. I just put the first pair in with the 1G sticks, because that was the only way I could max the system under Vista. I mad ZERO changes to the bios.

Then, after installing Windows 7, which I did today. It may have defaulted to the 1G speed. I'll have to check that I guess. But then, I turned off the system, and put all 4 of the same 2G into each slot and rebooted. Don't know if this fixed the bios or left it as it originally was. Again, I made no changes to the bios. I wouldn't know what to change anyway.

After this was running, I swapped out my 7300LE )64G RAM) and installed a EVGA GeForce 540Ti, which has 2G RAM and uses GDR5 ram, I believe. My 3D graphics went from 25fps to 2000fps and the graphics was very smooth and very nice. It went from looking at graphics that resembled a Mickey Mouse cartoon ;-) to watching something like Avatar.

My overall computer rating went from about 289 to 871 and I think I could squeeze more out of it. Some who have this process or score as high as 1600. But I didn't want to dump a bunch more money into a better graphics card, seeing as how I'm not a gamer anyway.

One thing I overlooked was the power supply requirement on the 540TI. It claims to need 400W, with 24A on the 12V line. Mine is 300W, with only 18A on 12V. Guess a new power supply is in order.

It's a great learning experience. Everything went very well... I think. Need to see if there is any tweaking of what I have, that can squeeze more power out of the system, as it is now. That RAM made a huge difference is speed of launching my programs and booting. It boots fast now. I don't really know if this is a Windows 7 thing or a RAM thing. But it's fast now.

Thanks,
Mike
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nibiru2012 Nibiru2012 is offline
Quick Scotty, beam me up!
Nibiru2012's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Planet X
Posts: 4,956
Thanked: 1102
 
      03-19-2012
Usually increasing and/or upgrading RAM will significantly increase your speeds.

You're definitely underpowered, probably the stock PSU in there for sure. I recommend you get at least a 450-500 watt Bronze Certified PSU. The modular ones are best in that you don't have any extra cables to deal with, but that's your choice.

I recommend either Corsair, SeaSonic, Antec or ThermalTake, they're all very good PSUs.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Would Office 2003 run with Windows 7? Kalario Installation, Setup and Updates 11 08-07-2011 05:44 AM
Windows would not start error codes jimdana1942 Windows 7 Support 1 11-10-2010 05:52 PM
Would It be worth installing windows 7 on an old machine? Coco General Discussion 15 01-21-2010 09:42 PM
How much would you pay for a boxed retail copy of Windows 7 Professional? clifford_cooley General Discussion 14 06-03-2009 02:22 PM
What changes would you make to Windows 7? Sgt Gonk General Discussion 8 04-06-2009 08:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 AM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.