Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

Intel (Lynnfield vs Bloomfield)

 
 
Veedaz Veedaz is offline
~
Veedaz's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,988
Thanked: 330
 
      09-12-2009
I thought we were talking i5 / i9 32nm Clifford ?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is online now
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 930
 
      09-12-2009
Sorry - I miss read the Core i5 Clarkdale column. So the P57, H57, & Q57 Chipset will support the 32nm CPU's

Edit:
However link two is a P55 Chipset that is not listed under the i5 32nm Clarkdale column for a supported chipset

Last edited by clifford_cooley; 09-12-2009 at 04:51 PM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
Veedaz Veedaz is offline
~
Veedaz's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,988
Thanked: 330
 
      09-12-2009
Yes should do Clifford, and i would lay £ that Gigabyte will be releasing more new boards in the near future, there a good camp and like to be first
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kougar Kougar is offline
OCing one chip at a time
Kougar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Thanked: 94
 
      09-12-2009
Gulftown is LGA1366, it will only work on X58 boards.

Lynnfield and Clarkdale work on LGA1156, which would be the P55 boards.

Arrandale is the mobile socket for laptops, so don't worry about that one.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Thrax Thrax is offline
Super Moderator
Thrax's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit Metro
Posts: 926
Thanked: 262
Send a message via ICQ to Thrax Send a message via AIM to Thrax Thrax's Twitter Pag
 
      09-13-2009
Right now it's also looking like Gulftown will only be available at the $999 pricepoint for several months, too. The first and only scheduled GT chip is the Core i9 1000 XE chip for ~$1000 in lots of 1000.

If that's true, it means people looking to get price performance are:
1. Stuck with Bloomfield, or...
2. Saddled with the dead-end LGA1156 socket.

I hope Intel reconsiders, because that's an impossibly douchetastic maneuver.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kougar Kougar is offline
OCing one chip at a time
Kougar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Thanked: 94
 
      09-26-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thrax View Post
Right now it's also looking like Gulftown will only be available at the $999 pricepoint for several months, too. The first and only scheduled GT chip is the Core i9 1000 XE chip for ~$1000 in lots of 1000.

If that's true, it means people looking to get price performance are:
1. Stuck with Bloomfield, or...
2. Saddled with the dead-end LGA1156 socket.

I hope Intel reconsiders, because that's an impossibly douchetastic maneuver.
That's been known for months though, except for maybe the dead-end part.

Until now nobody knew what things looked like beyond Gulftown's socket. What is interesting is both LGA1366 and LGA1156 appear to be "dead end" now. So far it appears Sandy Bridge is going to introduce a entirely new socket, something called "Socket R" that uses the same mounting holes as LGA1366. XtremeForums
 
Reply With Quote
 
Thrax Thrax is offline
Super Moderator
Thrax's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit Metro
Posts: 926
Thanked: 262
Send a message via ICQ to Thrax Send a message via AIM to Thrax Thrax's Twitter Pag
 
      09-28-2009
A new socket with a new generation was completely unavoidable. But whereas Lynnfield has no upgrade options between now and Sandy Bridge (Westmere LGA1156 CPUs will be dual core APUs), LGA1366 has at least one drop-in replacement in the wings.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kougar Kougar is offline
OCing one chip at a time
Kougar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Thanked: 94
 
      10-02-2009
It might be better than nothing, but I think LGA1156 has a very good prospects that it will remain around and updated long after Sandy Bridge launches. There isn't any reason to change the low-end to midrange socket when Sandy Bridge will be a high-end processor targeting the same market LGA1366 resides in. They'll be getting rid of LGA1366 regardless, the option for expensive hex-cores notwithstanding.
 
Reply With Quote
 
LowWaterMark LowWaterMark is offline
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1
Thanked: 0
 
      07-08-2010
Rip Van Winkle 9 mos later . . .

The ol' Sandy River Bridge is a beautiful place. In Zigzag, OR - winding up Mt. Hood just off an access road called E. Lolo Pass (I think) is $5000 of spikes and ties that will become the moniker for the biggest chips of the next decade (I'll betcha). Last time I was there, the weightiest chips to cross it were Doritos. We had Pong at the cabin, and I was good.

Here's my plan in no small part influenced by the article I just read and the fact that I already grabbed up an ASUS Rampage III Extreme. It seems most rational to go with an Intel Core i7 920 now, Westmere later.Let them laugh now. I might invest in the power module now (Sivetstone ST1000-P), and back off on the RAM. Perhaps G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 PC3 12800with loose timings at $25 per GB (3 x 2).

How does my core sound?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows 7 64x problems on Intel Server (Workstation) pepperoni75 Windows 7 Support 9 09-28-2010 04:34 PM
Intel Claims GPUs are Only 14x Faster Nibiru2012 Hardware 2 06-30-2010 01:43 PM
Intel D975XBX2 Marvell SATA driver needed for Windows 7 eschreibman Drivers 8 11-10-2009 12:07 AM
Intel 5350 wimax intel says illegal to install yourself dzuchowski Drivers 4 11-02-2009 09:01 PM
Windows 7 slow on Intel Celeron? echelon Hardware 6 06-07-2009 10:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 AM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33