Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

Footswitch?

 
 
Gene E. Bloch
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanked:
 
      06-10-2011
On 6/09/2011, choro posted:
> On 09/06/2011 03:41, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>> On 6/08/2011, choro posted:
>>> You are a real stumbling block, aren't you?!

>>
>> Are you dyslexic?


> dsylxeic?


> Wathever does that maen? ;-)


I resufe to tell you, ohter than to point out that you aparrenlty
didn't read my singatuer carfully.

:-)

Footnote:
In truth, if I don't use a spell checker followed by a manual check,
that's what my typing looks like anyway...

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
choro
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanked:
 
      06-11-2011
On 10/06/2011 16:33, Allen wrote:
> On 6/9/2011 7:33 PM, choro wrote:
>> On 09/06/2011 15:33, Allen wrote:
>>> On 6/8/2011 5:39 PM, choro wrote:
>>>> On 08/06/2011 20:19, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>>>>> On 6/08/2011, choro posted:
>>>>>> I am a touch typist and used to write news stories at 80 wpm all day
>>>>>> long; so you can rest assured that I know what I am talking about.
>>>>>> And
>>>>>> that was on old mechanical typewriters which had keyboards sloping
>>>>>> upwards away from the typist. That design was for a reason!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, to allow the actuation levers on the several rows of keys to
>>>>> coexist.
>>>>
>>>> You are a real stumbling block, aren't you?!
>>>>
>>>> Have you ever studied the movement of the fingers as you type? When
>>>> extended to a higher row the finger would have to more a longer
>>>> distance
>>>> to hit the key. Making each row higher helps cancel this effect.
>>>>
>>>> There is a truth in what you say but there is a truth in what I say,
>>>> too.
>>>> --
>>>> choro
>>>> *****
>>> The goal of the designers of the first typewriter and the first Linotype
>>> was to make the devices WORK--not to make them comfortable for the
>>> operators. Perhaps it's time for you to listen to Gene and others,
>>> rather than to set yourself up as some sort of guru of gurus because you
>>> can TYPE just as millions and millions of others could over the years.
>>> To even think that the KB was originally slanted for operator comfort
>>> (at a time when the goal was just to make it work) is the height of
>>> arrogance.
>>> Allen

>>
>> Yes, I know QWERTY keyboard and all that! But do you think that that was
>> the only problem they addressed? That ergonomics didn't come in? You
>> must be joking. Ergonomics might be a new word as far as popularity goes
>> but before the word was popularized, we had chairs and armchairs that
>> were a damned sight more comfortable than today's MFI monstrosities you
>> sit in and can't get up!
>>
>> It is those at the height of arrogance who accuse others or arrogance.
>>
>> --choro

> Goodbye.


Adios, Farewell! Good riddance!
-- choro --
 
Reply With Quote
 
Leon Manfredi
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanked:
 
      06-11-2011
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 01:16:17 +0100, choro <> wrote:

>On 10/06/2011 16:33, Allen wrote:
>> On 6/9/2011 7:33 PM, choro wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2011 15:33, Allen wrote:
>>>> On 6/8/2011 5:39 PM, choro wrote:
>>>>> On 08/06/2011 20:19, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/08/2011, choro posted:
>>>>>>> I am a touch typist and used to write news stories at 80 wpm all day
>>>>>>> long; so you can rest assured that I know what I am talking about.
>>>>>>> And
>>>>>>> that was on old mechanical typewriters which had keyboards sloping
>>>>>>> upwards away from the typist. That design was for a reason!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, to allow the actuation levers on the several rows of keys to
>>>>>> coexist.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are a real stumbling block, aren't you?!
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you ever studied the movement of the fingers as you type? When
>>>>> extended to a higher row the finger would have to more a longer
>>>>> distance
>>>>> to hit the key. Making each row higher helps cancel this effect.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a truth in what you say but there is a truth in what I say,
>>>>> too.
>>>>> --
>>>>> choro
>>>>> *****
>>>> The goal of the designers of the first typewriter and the first Linotype
>>>> was to make the devices WORK--not to make them comfortable for the
>>>> operators. Perhaps it's time for you to listen to Gene and others,
>>>> rather than to set yourself up as some sort of guru of gurus because you
>>>> can TYPE just as millions and millions of others could over the years.
>>>> To even think that the KB was originally slanted for operator comfort
>>>> (at a time when the goal was just to make it work) is the height of
>>>> arrogance.
>>>> Allen
>>>
>>> Yes, I know QWERTY keyboard and all that! But do you think that that was
>>> the only problem they addressed? That ergonomics didn't come in? You
>>> must be joking. Ergonomics might be a new word as far as popularity goes
>>> but before the word was popularized, we had chairs and armchairs that
>>> were a damned sight more comfortable than today's MFI monstrosities you
>>> sit in and can't get up!
>>>
>>> It is those at the height of arrogance who accuse others or arrogance.
>>>
>>> --choro

>> Goodbye.

>
>Adios, Farewell! Good riddance!
>-- choro --


What did you expect from a pack of down_unders!
 
Reply With Quote
 
Peter Jason
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanked:
 
      06-11-2011
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:19:16 -0700, Gene E. Bloch
<> wrote:

>On 6/08/2011, choro posted:
>> I am a touch typist and used to write news stories at 80 wpm all day long; so
>> you can rest assured that I know what I am talking about. And that was on old
>> mechanical typewriters which had keyboards sloping upwards away from the
>> typist. That design was for a reason!

>
>Yes, to allow the actuation levers on the several rows of keys to
>coexist.


I seem to have less trouble when I keep my wrists in the air as I
type. Perhaps the fingers have to stretch less therefore. Until now
I have kept them resting on the bench or wooden plank. Anyway I'll
try this for a while.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 PM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33