Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

exFAT for XP users.

 
 
Mychael Mychael is offline
Established Member
Mychael's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Melbourne, victoria
Posts: 1,124
Thanked: 87
Send a message via ICQ to Mychael Send a message via MSN to Mychael Send a message via Skype™ to Mychael
 
      10-11-2010
Could not decide the right forum for this so settled on General.
Anyway really for those still useing XP as already supported in Win7 and Vista.

Go here:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955704

Description self explanatory. The install went fine for me.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is offline
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 930
 
      10-11-2010
What are some of the reasons one would want an exFAT partition?

I'm at a loss as to why one would need this file system.
Would this make things easier to share between MS and Linux?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mychael Mychael is offline
Established Member
Mychael's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Melbourne, victoria
Posts: 1,124
Thanked: 87
Send a message via ICQ to Mychael Send a message via MSN to Mychael Send a message via Skype™ to Mychael
 
      10-11-2010
From what I understood after reading the short article which gave the link I posted. exFAT is most beneficial for formatting the larger capacity flash drives which are available now.
It made no reference to cross platform compatibility other then if a flash drive is formatted to exFAT then XP cannot read it unless you have the patch installed.
 
Reply With Quote
 
clifford_cooley clifford_cooley is offline
(c_c)
clifford_cooley's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 4,509
Thanked: 930
 
      10-11-2010
All I really know is that the whole idea in using FAT32 with flash drives is so Pre-XP systems can read them. From what I understand, exFAT is an extension to the FAT32 file system for greater capacities. This is shocking because if XP cannot read the exFAT partitions without a patch then neither would the Pre-XP systems.

Looking at my query further, if one only uses XP, Vista, or 7 there would not be any need for a non-NTFS partition. My only other thoughts would be a cross-platform scenario.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mychael Mychael is offline
Established Member
Mychael's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Melbourne, victoria
Posts: 1,124
Thanked: 87
Send a message via ICQ to Mychael Send a message via MSN to Mychael Send a message via Skype™ to Mychael
 
      10-11-2010
The article mentioned that NTFS is not as efficient for flash media as exFAT is, NTFS (on a flash drive) will make it perform slower although it did not say to what extent it has this effect.

Last edited by Mychael; 10-12-2010 at 01:09 AM..
 
Reply With Quote
 
TrainableMan TrainableMan is online now
^ The World's First ^
TrainableMan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 4,654
Thanked: 887
 
      10-12-2010
NTFS, though more secure, on flash/pen drives & SSD causes more wear-and-tear than a FAT file structure, meaning they burn out faster so exFAT provides an extended FAT structure as an alternative to NTFS for referencing larger drives.

http://www.sevenforums.com/installat...at-format.html

Based on reading that, just don't try to install W7 OS on a exFAT formatted drive.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mychael Mychael is offline
Established Member
Mychael's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Melbourne, victoria
Posts: 1,124
Thanked: 87
Send a message via ICQ to Mychael Send a message via MSN to Mychael Send a message via Skype™ to Mychael
 
      10-12-2010
Tried it on one of my flash drives and true to it's description I now have an extra option for formatting a drive to exFAT. Worked fine.
 
Reply With Quote
 
catilley1092 catilley1092 is offline
Win 7/Linux Mint Lover
catilley1092's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,507
Thanked: 511
 
      10-12-2010
I've had a couple of larger drives (16GB) formatted as exFAT, and at the time, they both worked fine. I lost one of them, and the other is in a fancy plastic case, it makes a good paperweight.

But I no longer care for flash drives of that size. 4GB ones seem to hold up longer, and are of better quality, at a reasonable price. Larger ones, if they are good, costs a lot, for a few more bucks, you could have a pocket sized backup drive, such as a WD Passport.

Usually, when you get one of the larger ones (16GB or more) for less than $20, you've been screwed. The quality isn't there for that price.

But as far as exFAT goes, I've used it a little, but not long enough determine a difference from FAT32 or NTFS.

Cat
 
Reply With Quote
 
Core Core is offline
throwing darts
Core's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Akaa, Finland
Posts: 849
Thanked: 177
Send a message via MSN to Core Send a message via Yahoo to Core Send a message via Skype™ to Core Core's Twitter Pag
 
      10-12-2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by clifford_cooley View Post
Would this make things easier to share between MS and Linux?
I don't see how, since Linux supports both FAT and NTFS just fine.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
64 bit users = 32 bit users mistu4u News 3 07-13-2010 02:05 PM
Missing several folder under users folder qplo Windows 7 Support 0 07-01-2010 05:18 PM
Microsoft rolls out "Fix It Center" to Windows users Jeffreyobrien General Discussion 15 04-24-2010 06:24 AM
to downgrade or not to downgrade a users plea WyldBlackWolf General Discussion 6 01-07-2010 10:24 AM
ExFAT Format? parabola Windows 7 Support 4 10-30-2009 09:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 PM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33