Windows 7 Forums


Reply
Thread Tools

Do you overclock?

 
 
Kougar Kougar is offline
OCing one chip at a time
Kougar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Thanked: 94
 
      05-11-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
I've got a quad core Q6600 processor at the moment, and it's default clock is 2.4Ghz. At the moment it's running quite happily at 3.0Ghz using air cooling only (Zalman CNPS9500 cooler).

Was thinking about pushing it a little more, but my temps are around 55C under load so I don't want to try it long term.

There have been some great CPUs this past few years in terms of overclockability (is that a word!?), so I thought it would be interesting to see who else has.
I just upgraded my computer, my previous one was a Q6600. Those are very nice chips, and I ran mine anywhere from 3.2GHz to 3.6GHz using watercooling.

If your have DDR2-800MHz RAM I suggest you try 8 x 400 = 3.2GHz settings with a 1:1 memory ratio. That will give you the performance sweet spot. Anything beyond 3.2GHz will get extremely hot extremely fast, and 3.2GHz may get pretty warm with your current cooler. I wouldn't suggest the above settings if I thought it would be a risk though, anything above 70c for the cores is about my limit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
Very nice work there Khaotic, that's a huge overclock! It might sound like a silly question, but what is the wooden block in the bottom right of the pic? Is that just supporting something, or is it a component?
Looks like a wooden block. The watercooling pump is sitting on top, and the block is probably there so he can shorten the length of the tubes is my guess.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
Out of interest, how far do you think an air cooled i7 920 could go?
Depends greatly on if it is a C0 stepping or D0 stepping... if you look at his CPUZ screenshot he has a C0 stepping... that's very good results for a C0.

D0 steppings are significantly better (But are just now coming to market), and if you make sure to get a D0 you will pretty much be guaranteed a 4GHz overclock. In fact I'm still testing mine... I am at 4.2GHz with full stability using LinX, Prime95, Memtest, and some 3D games.



For CPU temperature monitoring I recommend RealTemp. The latest versions include support for NVIDIA GPUs and some other nifty bits. Link

Last edited by Kougar; 05-12-2009 at 06:31 PM.. Reason: Fixed a typo - should be 8 x 400FSB
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ian Ian is online now
Administrator
Ian's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: England
Posts: 3,090
Thanked: 450
Ian's Twitter Pag
 
      05-12-2009
Thanks for the comprehensive post Kougar! I've got DDR2-800, so I'll give that a go as 3.2 sounds like a comfortable middle ground

Have you noticed much of a performance improvemend since moving to the 920?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kougar Kougar is offline
OCing one chip at a time
Kougar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Thanked: 94
 
      05-12-2009
I have not had the chance yet to test my usual programs! I've been having to much fun overclocking like a madman, and I don't want to use my usual programs until I'm confident in the stability. I think I'll be sticking with 4.2Ghz though, anything more is taking to much vcore than I'm comfortable with.

I can say that with a single 750GB hard drive and stock settings, Windows 7 installed in under 17 minutes from the first mouse click until reaching an idle desktop. I don't remember Vista being anywhere nearly that fast.
 
Reply With Quote
 
sushrukh sushrukh is offline
New Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kolkata , India
Posts: 13
Thanked: 1
sushrukh's Twitter Pag
 
      05-25-2009
I'm also using a Q6600 with a clock speed of 3200 Mhz.I'm on air cooler.The cooler is Thermalright Si128 with a Vantec 120mm fan.My temps are around 52-55.So, i won't overclock it anymore.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian Ian is online now
Administrator
Ian's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: England
Posts: 3,090
Thanked: 450
Ian's Twitter Pag
 
      05-25-2009
I'm now also running at 3.2 thanks to the advice above - my temps are around 55C under load, but I need to create a better airflow path inside my case which should help things out.
 
Reply With Quote
 
sushrukh sushrukh is offline
New Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kolkata , India
Posts: 13
Thanked: 1
sushrukh's Twitter Pag
 
      05-25-2009
I'm running my CPU within a Cosmos S chassis.So, there shouldn't be any heat related issues.Though i know that i can upgrade to a better HSF but my current set is serving me fine.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Psikea Psikea is offline
Established Member
Psikea's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
Thanked: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to Psikea
 
      05-26-2009
i do not overclock anything dunno y , just have it all workin at its based freqz
 
Reply With Quote
 
sexytool sexytool is offline
Member
sexytool's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 61
Thanked: 6
 
      06-05-2009
I thought CoreTemp was officially an Intel information tool.
That's why it has the warning in the readme;

"All AMD K8 CPUs are supported starting with the early SH-C0 stepping and up. The latest 65nm BH-G1 and DH-G1 revisions give inaccurate readings."

Finding your max warranty covered temperature (Intel);
http://processorfinder.intel.com/Default.aspx
Select your processor family and then click on the link on the far left in the column sSpec#

For AMD i'm not sure if they allow overclocking at all.
A mate of mine in the I.T industry stated that intels' warranty now covers over-clocking as long as you don't go over a core voltage of 1.4 volts and common sense tells me it'd be best not to go over your Maximum warranty covered temperature even under load.

I run an e7300 @ 3.33Ghtz with max temps hitting 72 degrees with stock cooling.
I think i got pretty lucky there.

It's rather annoying to find that Tj.Max is not an accurate representation of your max warranty covered temperature; remember that you should not go over the temperature listed on the intel site.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kougar Kougar is offline
OCing one chip at a time
Kougar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Thanked: 94
 
      06-08-2009
Not a bad overclock for the stock cooler!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sexytool View Post
A mate of mine in the I.T industry stated that intels' warranty now covers over-clocking as long as you don't go over a core voltage of 1.4 volts and common sense tells me it'd be best not to go over your Maximum warranty covered temperature even under load.
To clarify, the voltages that void Intel's warranty depend on the processor in question. Specifically it depends on the processor family and the process size the CPU was fabricated on. Either way, 1.4v is enough to void your warranty on just about any currently sold Intel CPU's. For example, anything above 1.3625v on your E7300 will void its warranty. Link

The temperature itself isn't used to determine the warranty, it is just a specification of the temperature range the processor is guaranteed to operate normally within. If a CPU gets hot enough it will go unstable, overclockers will be familiar with this as the temperature will always affect the range of the overclock and it's apparent stability.

Also, AMD does support overclocking, as they release numerous Black Edition CPU's with the CPU multiplier unlocked... for anywhere from $60 to less than $240 for their high-end part. The only mutliplier unlocked Intel CPU cost $999.
 
Reply With Quote
 
sexytool sexytool is offline
Member
sexytool's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 61
Thanked: 6
 
      06-08-2009
Thanks i was a bit surprised myself as well
I achieved this in summer too when it was ~40 degrees Celcius / 105*F.

Also thanks for the heads up on the Black Editions i didn't realise they were actually warranty covered. Last two years i desired a change and have worked in the manual labouring field so i've had no real reason to keep up with the latest processor information in depth.
1.3625v is rather an odd number. Wonder how they hit that number.
1.1875v is enough for me i think, i'm totally stable at this voltage.

Oddly enough, Vcc and Vtt are max warranty covered 1.45v however;
You will see a drop in lifespan of the unit, if it runs at all after exceeding 1.45v
From what i'm gathering, Intel will warranty cover any voltage and any temperature, as long as it's not sustained or rediculously outside the expected maximum ranges, e.g 3.0v

So a 1.6v clock to 80 degrees C would be covered by warranty if done for only 10 minutes. However you could also expect a degradation in expected lifespan, if the processor survived it at all. (Mine did ! )
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows 7 64bit extreme compatibility errors DevilSShadoW Windows 7 Support 11 08-11-2009 12:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.
W7Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33