On 8/26/2011 10:04 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:57:32 +0000 (UTC), Boris<>
> wrote:
>
>> Andy Burns<> wrote in
>> news::
>>
>>> Bob Hatch wrote:
>>>
>>>> Copy/Wipe and
>>>> Acronis and they both work without a problem.
>>>
>>> I purchased an SSD which came with a USB caddy to move your existing
>>> spinny disc into and a copy of Acronis to copy the contents to the SSD.
>>>
>>> Acronis managed to display a handful of sector write errors (or
>>> similar), at the end of which it pronounced "copy succesful" but of
>>> course it wasn't. I chucked the acronis CD in the bin and used gparted
>>> as I should have done from the start.
>>>
>>
>> I've looked into Acronis, and I've downloaded and read the user's manual.
>> For me, it's just too complicated. Also, the reviews are mixed, and your
>> experience is one I've heard before.
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>
> That's one reason why there are so many options available. For me,
> Acronis is dead simple and has worked flawlessly since I started using
> it some 5-7 years ago or so. For others who don't like it for one
> reason or another, there are plenty of other options. The important
> thing is that most people should use _something_.
>
I'm with you, Char. Acronis, to me, is simple and does the job. By using
a SATA dock, hooked up to an eSATA connection on the computer I cut the
time for a clone from around 3 hours to 36 minutes. Also, like you said,
to each his own. It's what works for "you", but it won't work if you
don't have it or don't use it.
--
I respect that you have an opinion. Don't confuse that
respect with really giving a crap what it is.
"Anon"
http://www.bobhatch.com
http://www.tdsrvresort.com