Anytime Upgrade Solved

I replaced the drive in the Toshiba and it runs faster.
HD tune has a much better scan and my antivirus also scans faster.

Thanks for the help


KenW

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:14:46 -0600, Ken1943 wrote:

> I replaced the drive in the Toshiba and it runs faster.
> HD tune has a much better scan and my antivirus also scans faster.
>
> Thanks for the help
>
> KenW

Would you consider posting this as a reply in the original thread, or do
you prefer to leave us guessing?

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:11:06 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
<not-> wrote:

>On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:14:46 -0600, Ken1943 wrote:
>
>> I replaced the drive in the Toshiba and it runs faster.
>> HD tune has a much better scan and my antivirus also scans faster.
>>
>> Thanks for the help
>>
>> KenW
>
>Would you consider posting this as a reply in the original thread, or do
>you prefer to leave us guessing?
I thought the original was too long, but will do


KenW

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:34:11 -0600, Ken1943 <> wrote:

>On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:11:06 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
><not-> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:14:46 -0600, Ken1943 wrote:
>>

- snip -



>>>
>>> KenW
>>
>>Would you consider posting this as a reply in the original thread, or do
>>you prefer to leave us guessing?
>I thought the original was too long, but will do
>
>
>KenW


You can use " -snip- " as I did above just for illustration to
help both you and the reader. Just don't snip the portion of the
post you are replying to. I did above only to illustrate the use of
"snip" but normally I wouldn't do this. In other words, just snip out
the irrelevant pieces. Sometimes when the original post is long and I
want to reply to several points made, I will break up the original
post as in paragraphs and reply under each paragraph usually with
spaces between the original post, my reply and the next original part
of the reply. Hope I haven't confused you.

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:15:10 -0500, RnR wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:34:11 -0600, Ken1943 <> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:11:06 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
>><not-> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:14:46 -0600, Ken1943 wrote:
>>>
>
> - snip -
>
>>>>
>>>> KenW
>>>
>>>Would you consider posting this as a reply in the original thread, or do
>>>you prefer to leave us guessing?
>>I thought the original was too long, but will do
>>
>>
>>KenW
>
> You can use " -snip- " as I did above just for illustration to
> help both you and the reader. Just don't snip the portion of the
> post you are replying to. I did above only to illustrate the use of
> "snip" but normally I wouldn't do this. In other words, just snip out
> the irrelevant pieces. Sometimes when the original post is long and I
> want to reply to several points made, I will break up the original
> post as in paragraphs and reply under each paragraph usually with
> spaces between the original post, my reply and the next original part
> of the reply. Hope I haven't confused you.

Let me add that in some newsreaders, if you highlight part of a post
before clicking on Reply, only the highlighted part will be quoted in
the reply.

I sometimes use that to create confusing replies, but that's an
unintentional result of carelessness :-)

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

On 10/1/2011 4:47 PM, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
> I sometimes use that to create confusing replies, but that's an
> unintentional result of carelessness :-)

Yeah we all know that you do that accidentally on purpose from time to
time just to liven thing up around here. ;-)


--

Roy Smith
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit
Thunderbird 7.0.1
Sunday, October 02, 2011 7:41:27 PM

On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:41:30 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:

> On 10/1/2011 4:47 PM, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>> I sometimes use that to create confusing replies, but that's an
>> unintentional result of carelessness :-)
>
> Yeah we all know that you do that accidentally on purpose from time to
> time just to liven thing up around here. ;-)

Oops. You caught me :-)

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)